Partner Content

Is your boat crew putting you at risk?

“Jones Act liability is essential, but many vessel owners and insurance brokers don’t understand the full implications of it.”

Most people are familiar with workers’ compensation insurance. On land, employers are required to provide coverage for things like medical expenses and lost wages when employees are injured on the job. Failing to do so may expose the employer to a broader range of liability.

At sea, vessel owners are also responsible for insuring their crew, but the regulations governing employment liability and the way coverage is structured work differently than they do on land. Maritime employment liability is defined by the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, also known as the Jones Act, written to protect seamen from being exploited.

Created in response to the destruction of the U.S. fleet by the German navy during World War I, the Jones Act sought to ensure safe conditions for merchant mariners operating in U.S. waters. Nearly 100 years old now, the Jones Act has been amended several times, but it is still the prevailing law for regulating the safety and workers’ compensation of a crew. Among its key elements pertaining to employment liability, the Jones Act

• Requires compensation for an injured seaman for transportation, wages, maintenance and care.

• Sets standards for vessel maintenance; safety equipment such as lifeboats; and crew qualifications, training and licensing.

• Gives seamen who are injured or become sick while in service of a vessel the right to recover, regardless of whether the seaman or the ship’s owner was negligent in the accident that caused the injury and in some cases illness.

• In cases where the injury was caused in any way by negligence on behalf of the employer, entitles the injured seaman to compensation for pain and suffering, lost wages and other damages.

Adding to the complexity for vessel owners and operators, the Jones Act applies only when jurisdiction falls to U.S. courts. On bigger vessels with large crews operating in multiple jurisdictions, employment liability becomes more complicated based on the registry of the vessel (many are internationally registered), the nationalities of crew members, the reimbursement of expenses, and the logistics of getting the medical care at sea.

Jones Act liability is essential coverage for any vessel with a paid crew. It provides standards of recovery and places limitations on the employer’s liability. But many vessel owners and well-intentioned insurance brokers don’t always understand the full implications of the Jones Act on their maritime employment liability. Many have been led—incorrectly—to think that they’re covered under excess liability policies. Many are underinsured; it’s not uncommon to see a $5 million vessel with only $500,000 in liability.

To complicate things even further, Jones Act liability isn’t available through an umbrella or excess liability policy in the way other employment insurance might be. For example, if you employ a staff in your home, it’s relatively easy to add domestic employment liability to your homeowners insurance and excess liability policy. But the maritime employment liability to paid crew can’t be added to an excess liability policy.

Employment liability is a huge exposure for vessel owners. It’s important to work with an insurance broker who understands the vessel registry, nationality of crew, jurisdictional liability and the full implications of the maritime economics and logistics including the Jones Act, so that proper liability can be arranged.

Read More From Risk Strategies

Risk & Insurance

Disclaimer: Worth magazine is a financial publisher and does not recommend or endorse investment, legal, insurance or tax advisors. The listing of any firm in the 2023 Worth® Leading AdvisorsTM Program does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement by Worth magazine of any such firm and is not based upon Worth magazine’s experience with, or prior dealings with, any advisor. The information presented for each advisor, including but not limited to any related profile, statistical data, presentation, report, commentary, recommendation or strategy, has been provided by such advisor without review or independent verification by Worth magazine. Any such information is the sole responsibility of the advisor. Worth magazine makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of such information, assumes no liability for any inaccuracies or omissions therein and disclaims responsibility for the suitability of any particular investment recommendation or strategy for any person. Nothing contained in Worth magazine constitutes or should be construed as any form of investment, legal, insurance or tax advice or as a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or trade any securities, financial instruments or assets. Readers are advised to consult their legal, financial, insurance and tax advisors prior to making any investment or pursuing any investment strategy. Past, model or hypothetical performance is not indicative of future results.

back to top