“Cryptocurrency, biotech and cannabis are examples of asymmetric risk opportunities that could be acquired for the purpose of building generational wealth.”
The U.S. economic expansion that began in June 2009 is now the longest in U.S. history. Against that backdrop, we frequently get questions about whether it is better to make defensive shifts in one’s portfolio or to look for uncorrelated investment opportunities, which often have an asymmetric risk profile, like Bitcoin—which is back in the spotlight. While it is impossible to know the future of Bitcoin or accurately predict the timing of market cycles, it is possible to answer this question by explaining a fundamental financial planning framework that sorts assets and investment opportunities into three distinct and sequential categories: financial security, financial independence and generational wealth.
The goal of financial security planning, and any asset in this “safety bucket,” is to provide peace of mind, especially in the event of an unexpected loss of income, health or life. It typically includes cash equivalents, annuities, insurance policies and interest- or income-bearing products like bonds or high-dividend-paying equity holdings. Despite being the least exciting category, thorough security-centric planning, coupled with strategic asset selection, can have significant implications for the success of the other two categories and a client’s overall financial health. As an example, right-sizing an emergency fund to adequately account for fixed expenditures, the potential cushion of dual income, the degree of job security and any easily accessible assets (like a no-cost, low-rate HELOC or a whole-life policy with cash value that grows tax-deferred and can be borrowed against tax-free), can minimize the drag that excess cash has on total return.
The second bucket goes beyond security and targets financial independence. Longer-term goals, like funding retirement and children’s education, are typically considered in this category. Despite being subject to market volatility, an investment account with asset class, sector, style, geographic and manager diversification has the best chance for more robust long-term growth. A well-defined time horizon, thorough financial security planning and regular, strategic rebalancing help mitigate the risk associated with contribution, withdrawal and return timing. With proper planning, disciplined savers should never have to pay withdrawal penalties or liquidate assets for income during a down market.
Only after the prior two buckets have been planned and adequately funded should assets be allocated to the third, “home-run” bucket, which is where an investor with a higher risk tolerance would consider high-potential-return investment opportunities that also come with high, and often asymmetric, risk. Opportunities like biotech, stem cell advancements, cannabis and cryptocurrency are all examples of asymmetric risk opportunities that could potentially have a place in this category of assets, acquired for the purpose of building generational wealth. In this category, investments with low or no correlation to the stock market can also help reduce aggregate volatility.
The allocation of assets among these buckets should always align with a client’s timeline, values, financial obligations, financial goals and risk appetite and should be adjusted accordingly over time. As an answer to the original question, the systemic approach above allows some clients to do both: tilt defensively in their financial independence bucket while still having permission to invest a portion of their generational wealth bucket in opportunities like cryptocurrency…and to sleep well at night, even if the ride gets bumpy.
Saugatuck Financial is a marketing name for Justin Charise, Alfred Schor and Mitch Janoff and is not a broker-dealer,registered investment advisor, subsidiary or other corporate affiliate of the North-western Mutual Life Insurance Company, Milwaukee, Wisc. (NM). Northwestern Mutual is the marketing name for NM and its subsidiaries. Charise, Schor and Janoff are representatives of Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Company®, NMWMC Milwaukee, Wisc., a subsidiary of NM and limited purpose federal savings bank, and registered representatives of Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC (securities), a subsidiary of NM, registered investment advisor, broker-dealer and member FINRA and SIPC.
Disclaimer: Worth magazine is a financial publisher and does not recommend or endorse investment, legal, insurance or tax advisors. The listing of any firm in the 2019 Worth® Leading AdvisorsTM Program does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement by Worth magazine of any such firm and is not based upon Worth magazine’s experience with, or prior dealings with, any advisor. The information presented for each advisor, including but not limited to any related profile, statistical data, presentation, report, commentary, recommendation or strategy, has been provided by such advisor without review or independent verification by Worth magazine. Any such information is the sole responsibility of the advisor. Worth magazine makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of such information, assumes no liability for any inaccuracies or omissions therein and disclaims responsibility for the suitability of any particular investment recommendation or strategy for any person. Nothing contained in Worth magazine constitutes or should be construed as any form of investment, legal, insurance or tax advice or as a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or trade any securities, financial instruments or assets. Readers are advised to consult their legal, financial, insurance and tax advisors prior to making any investment or pursuing any investment strategy. Past, model or hypothetical performance is not indicative of future results.