Partner Content

How can a nonprofit board improve financial outcomes?

How can a nonprofit board improve financial outcomes? © Bruce Lonngren

In an economy in which governmental spending is increasingly strained, nonprofit organizations are forced to play a larger role in serving the greater good. Driven by boards that are dedicated to ambitious missions, today’s nonprofits must simultaneously navigate dynamic financial markets and keep pace with the spending demands associated with fulfilling their missions.

In this context, board members should focus on three key areas to improve their ability to achieve favorable outcomes.


While a nonprofit’s mission may be clear, its financial focus often centers on the short-term needs of the organization and its beneficiaries. Additionally, funding requirements for existing programs are often budgeted based on historic demands, which may not be realistic. Establishing a clear, long-term financial plan will enable the organization to identify and support key priorities and appropriately allocate resources.

A board should engage its advisor in the creation of a well-defined, written investment-policy statement and a responsible asset-allocation strategy directly tied to the organization’s mission and priorities. These documents serve as guideposts and result in a shared responsibility for linking the organization’s mission and its investment portfolio.


Of late, many nonprofits have shifted to delegating their investment process to an outsourced provider, instead of attempting to undertake and/or control the process internally. There are several key reasons for this trend, including:

  • Lack of internal expertise, experience, and resources
  • Desire to access a broader set of asset classes and managers
  • Desire to improve risk management
  • Need for greater objectivity and fiduciary oversight

Such a structure requires that the board choose an advisor with demonstrated institutional consulting and investment-management experience, who is supported by strong research and reporting capabilities.


Additionally, many nonprofit boards have recently expanded their emphasis on sound fiduciary governance. The factors underlying this development include:

  • Increased complexity in global markets
  • Renewed focus on fiduciary practices and liability by regulators

Selecting an advisor who serves in a fiduciary capacity is critical; but simply being a fiduciary is not enough. The advisor should provide a robust fiduciary framework to support key decisions in the areas of asset allocation, manager selection, portfolio construction and spending. Following the Global Fiduciary Standard of Excellence best practices, developed by fi360’s Center for Fiduciary Studies, is a good start. Each of these practices builds credibility, improves consistency and creates a process that can endure changes in board membership and evolving organizational priorities.

The investment marketplace is an ever-evolving ecosystem that requires constant adaptation. Most nonprofits do not have the internal resources to keep pace with those changes while also focusing on their mission.

Outsourcing the responsibility for investment management and consulting is not just a trend; in many cases it is critical. Selecting an advisor who has deep experience in the nonprofit industry requires taking the time to understand organizational priorities and ultimately can create a legacy of fiduciary excellence that will help ensure a nonprofit’s mission is sustained and accomplished for years to come.

Read More from The Colony Group

Charitable Giving

Disclaimer: Worth magazine is a financial publisher and does not recommend or endorse investment, legal, insurance or tax advisors. The listing of any firm in the 2019 Worth® Leading AdvisorsTM Program does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement by Worth magazine of any such firm and is not based upon Worth magazine’s experience with, or prior dealings with, any advisor. The information presented for each advisor, including but not limited to any related profile, statistical data, presentation, report, commentary, recommendation or strategy, has been provided by such advisor without review or independent verification by Worth magazine. Any such information is the sole responsibility of the advisor. Worth magazine makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of such information, assumes no liability for any inaccuracies or omissions therein and disclaims responsibility for the suitability of any particular investment recommendation or strategy for any person. Nothing contained in Worth magazine constitutes or should be construed as any form of investment, legal, insurance or tax advice or as a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or trade any securities, financial instruments or assets. Readers are advised to consult their legal, financial, insurance and tax advisors prior to making any investment or pursuing any investment strategy. Past, model or hypothetical performance is not indicative of future results.

back to top