Home > Families of Worth

5 Estate Planning Misconceptions You Shouldn’t Buy Into

A financial expert breaks down some of the most common misconceptions that get in the way when setting up an estate plan.

Photo by Pixabay via Pexels

Estate planning should be a fairly straightforward exercise in taking stock of what has been accumulated and making sensible determinations as to how best to leave a lifetime’s legacy in good hands.

We all know the reality is often different, and it is easy to understand why—misconceptions, often based on emotions, arise and get in the way. These emotions—whether they be the pressure of time or the perceived need to be fair and equitable—are what cloud rational decision-making just when it is most needed. In my practice, I have found that reactive decisions seldom work as well as decisions based on strategies set in place over time. Below I address these and some of the other most common misconceptions that get in the way when setting up an estate plan or making alterations when life changes occur.

Ad A

Related COVID-19 Presents an Opportunity for Gift and Estate Planning at Low Valuations

Misconception #1: An Estate Plan Should Be Based Solely on Tax Mitigation

While important, taxes should never be the primary focus of a well thought-out estate plan. Tax-driven estate planning is even less important in 2020 since the Estate Tax Exemption is in excess of $11.5 million and fewer than 3 percent of taxpayers are ever going to need to worry about paying a federal estate tax. When I encounter this misconception, I ask my clients a simple question: “Forget taxes for a moment, instead tell me where you want your wealth to go?”  When the discussion gets centered on assets rather than taxes, we end up having a much more productive conversation. What, for instance, will happen to a family-owned business that is of no interest to the children? Now, instead of a tax mitigation strategy we need a business continuity plan—one that, no doubt, will have tax considerations as part of it. It just will not be taxes driving the decisions; it will be revenue distribution and value creation.

Misconception #2: I Should Leave Everything to My Children

To which I say, “Wait a minute, you owe your children nothing.” You may, of course, want to leave your children with the bulk of your estate, but why start there? I have often found it helpful to have an early discussion of how estate planning can be a creative exercise. Where can your lifetime’s assets best be put to use? The answer might spur some new thoughts and ideas that could, for instance, lead to the creation of a foundation that the children might take a role in leading. The point is to take the automatic thinking out of the estate-planning equation for a moment and consider your options

Ad B

Misconception #3: My Three Children Are So Very Different, But I Must Be Fair and Equitable with My Estate Plan

To this I say, “No, you do not.” Treating children equally sounds fine but is often not good business practice. Children, like everybody, have different skills, aspirations, hopes and dreams. The admittedly difficult decision to leave a family business to one child who shows interest and aptitude rather than to break it up into so-called equitable shares has proven to be the wisest choice for many as it puts an asset into the hands of someone who is far more likely to protect or add value over time rather than a sibling whose hopes and life ambitions may lie elsewhere.

Related How to Take Advantage of New Estate Planning Opportunities Caused by the Coronavirus

Misconception #4: I’ll Set Up a Trust…That Will Take Care of Everything

In my experience, that is often an effective strategy but one that is far more complex than it appears. In most cases a sizeable estate-planning strategy involves setting up a trust—either revocable or irrevocable. It is imperative to emphasize that when an asset is placed into an irrevocable trust, control of that asset is handed over to a trustee who has the fiduciary responsibility to the beneficiaries (not the grantor) of the trust, which includes both current income beneficiaries and eventual remainder beneficiaries. These differing interests can create inherent conflicts for the trustee. Problems often arise when a family member acts as a trustee when other family members are the beneficiaries. This is generally not a good idea as it can place a significant burden on the trustee and a strain on family relationships. Consider using a corporate or professional fiduciary to serve along with a family member. This can go a long way in reducing potential family conflict.

Misconception #5: My Estate Advisors Have My Best Interests in Mind, and They Are Working Together for Me as a Team

As a member of the Estate Planning Council of New York City (and one of those advisors), my reply to clients is, “That would be great, but you own this.” I have seen many estate advisors, be they CPAs, investment advisors, insurers or attorneys, work very well together but it does not happen as readily without clear direction from the stakeholder. Developing a compatible team rooted in open communications and clearly articulated roles is, to me, a prerequisite to a successful outcome of any estate.

Related Forging Family Partnerships: 3 Tips for Building Trust

Key Takeaways

When you are thinking about starting or updating your estate plan and related documents, these key takeaways should help you achieve your financial and family objectives:

  • Start your process broadly, thinking about what you want to happen to your wealth and family legacy. Then you can move on to developing a plan in the most tax-efficient manner.
  • Do not fall into the trap that everything must be divided equally among your descendants—match your assets to your children.
  • Use trusts only if they assist in achieving your overall goals regarding passing your wealth on to the next generation.
  • Give clear direction to your professional advisors so that they can work as a unified team to help you achieve your estate planning goals.

Christopher Wright is a J.D., CPA and partner at Marks Paneth LLP.

Related Articles