|
|
 |
 |
|
/ Home
/ Editorial / Z_Junk_ToSort /
|
| Feature |
Taxing Decisions
Michael Verdon
04/01/2005
|
Replacing graduated income taxes with a national sales tax (NST) is another evergreen idea that enjoys support in certain Washington circles. Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) proposed an NST in the mid-1990s, and more recently, Congressman John Linder (R-Ga.) has crafted NST legislation he calls FairTax, which he, perhaps wishfully, claimed enjoyed more bipartisan support than any other tax proposal. A national sales tax would eliminate the taxes on ordinary income, estates and gifts, and do away with the IRS. Linder’s proposal would emulate state sales taxes, and require consumers to pay a 23 percent levy whenever they make retail purchases. (Wholesale purchases by corporations would be tax-free.)
As with the flat tax, NST proponents want to simplify the revenue system and promote savings and investment. They argue that this would save hundreds of billions of dollars now spent each year by businesses on the costs of tax-code compliance. They also argue that the NST would collect revenues from everyone who benefits from government services in the country, including illegal aliens who do not now pay income taxes.
Any proposal that would eliminate taxes on investment income could have a radical effect on the value of affluent individuals’ portfolios. “Most high-net-worth portfolios
carry a lot of municipal bonds,” says C. Joseph Ramos, president of Private Consulting Group in Larkspur, Calif. “Under an NST, they could lose up to 20 percent of their value overnight.” Ramos notes that investors would quickly switch to higher-yielding corporate bonds, leaving the municipal issues to languish. He also believes that the elimination of the mortgage interest deduction could adversely affect investments such as real estate.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |