subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Z_Junk_ToSort /
Feature
Taxing Decisions
Michael Verdon
04/01/2005


There is some support in Congress for variations of a flat tax—the proposed rates range from 17 to 20 percent—but most observers believe that it is not politically viable. “If the administration comes up with a flat tax, it will totally blow its credibility,” and paint it as beholden to its ultraconservative wing, says Kent Smetters, a former deputy secretary of the Treasury and now a professor at the Wharton School of Business. “That is something the Democrats would demagogue to death.” Opponents of the flat tax say it is less equitable than the current system because the middle class would pay more in taxes because of the elimination of the mortgage interest deduction.

While a flat tax might deliver some tax savings to affluent taxpayers, financial advisor Cynthia Conger of Arkansas Financial Group in Little Rock says that it may be less than expected. “I have a few dual-doctor couples who are in the 36 percent bracket,” Conger notes. “But after deductions, their average rates are 23 to 26 percent. That’s not very far from the flat rate of 17 percent.” By contrast, those earning $90,000 would see their real tax rates—after deductions—increase from 13 percent to 17 percent. “This would increase taxes on lower- and middle-income people extraordinarily and hit them very hard,” she says. Meanwhile, affluent individuals would pay 6 to 9 percentage points less on their taxes.

Mark Watson, a tax specialist with Asset Management Advisors, a multifamily office in Palm Beach, Fla., thinks a flat tax could have a more wide-reaching effect. “If it reduces taxes for high-net-worth individuals, then you will see less interest in using tax shelters and other offshore investments,” he says. “You won’t have to use these tools because you won’t need them.” Watson says that any reform that includes permanent removal of the estate tax could represent a death knell for tax shelters. “I expect tax reform could significantly depress that industry,” he says.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Paying for Lunch
» When the Levies Break
» Golden Oldies Back in Vogue
» Kiddie Tax Expands
» Business Essentials
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference