subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Investment & Risk Management /
Risk & Reward: Strategy
Big Deal
John Ferry
07/01/2006

"So far we have not had a single problem," Blackstone’s Friedman reports. "We try to choose our consortium partners based on firms we know that generally have the same views that we do. Will we experience significant disagreements among some consortium members in the future? Most probably. But it hasn’t happened to us yet in any of our consortium deals done in the past few years." Friedman says different parts of the process can be farmed out to individual partners–one partner is more responsible for the "100-day plan," the strategy immediately put in action once control is acquired, while another might be responsible for asset divestiture plans, and so on.

Because the club megadeal is a new phenomenon, it may be several years until sponsoring consortia engineer liquidity events and observers can see just how successful they have been. Until then, potential investors in the funds that pursue them should scrutinize the value-creation rationale behind every deal, while keeping in mind that the safety element that a big balance sheet introduces can also stifle returns. And, as with any transaction type, there is always the chance that a deal will sour. As Jacobs says, "There is no question that there is going to be some fallout from some bad deal down the road."


Variations in Management Fees

Fee (percent)

Funds(percent of those in study)

< 1.0

3.9

1.0 to 1.19

3.5

1.2 to 1.39

2.3

1.4 to 1.59

15.1

1.6 to 1.79

5.4

1.8 to 1.99

0.8

2.0 to 2.19

43.0

2.2 to 2.39

5.4

2.4 to 2.59

16.7

> 2.6

3.9

Management Fees Versus Fund Size

Fund Size ($ millions)

Average Fee
(percent)

< 50

2.07

51 — 100

2.18

101 — 200

2.11

201 — 500

1.94

501 — 1,000

1.78

> 1,000

1.62

The Key Is the Fee
Investors evaluating private equity fund managers should not assume that all fee structures are alike. Indeed, a report issued in April by UK-based consultancy Private Equity Intelligence (2006 Fund Terms Advisor) warned that annual management fees and performance fees vary widely among funds and can have a substantial effect on returns.

The consultants, who examined more than 300 private equity funds worldwide, say that the widely held view that fees are pretty much standard–a 2 percent annual management fee plus a 20 percent performance levy–is incorrect, and that some funds can charge as much as a 2.5 percent management fee plus 25 percent for performance above an agreed rate of return (top chart).

"While private equity is a higher-return asset class, the expenses are also high, and you need to have a fairly large portfolio to justify paying them," says Franklin Park’s James McGovern. There is some good news for those considering taking exposure to megadeals, however. The consultants found that management fees tend to decline as the size of the fund increases, with funds of $1 billion-plus having average management fees of only 1.6 percent (bottom chart).



John Ferry is a senior correspondent for Worth.

1 | 2 | 3 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Small is Beautiful
» Private Equity's Wide Embrace
» The Public Eye
» The Tables Have Turned: Private Equity
» The Backdoor Investor
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here