Doomsayers believe that in the
21st century, large parts of the world will suffer water shortages. More people
will live in poverty and famine than ever before as the need for fresh water far
outstrips supply. Some even suggest that in the coming century, nations will
fight wars to secure ever scarcer and increasingly valuable water resources.
Investors, however, see the flip side to such a scenario:
Scarcity increases demand, which translates into opportunities. Driven by this
optimism, hedge funds and mutual funds that invest in the global water industry
in various ways are popping up like weeds. A number of water-themed
exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recently debuted, and several banks now issue
water-based structured notes—simple investment contracts designed to offer
exposure to the water sector. Clearly, when it comes to water scarcity, the
financial sector sees the glass as half-full.
The case for investing long term in water is compelling: Global
demand for fresh water is rising exponentially because of population growth and
rapid industrial expansion in emerging markets, along with demand rising faster
than population growth in developed countries. According to the Department of
Interior, water demand in the U.S. has tripled in the past 30 years, while the
population has grown 50 percent. On the supply side, developed countries have
failed to invest in their aging water and sewage systems. "Threats to the
world’s freshwater resources are growing as populations grow, economic demands
increase and institutions fail to respond. It is increasingly apparent that we
are not properly managing water as a scarce resource," says Peter Gleick,
president of the Pacific Institute, an environmental think tank in Oakland,
Calif.
Jeff Czarniak, co-portfolio manager of investment firm TWF
Management’s Water Fund, which is a predominantly long-short equity hedge fund,
says that three fundamental factors make the water sector a great place to be
for the next several decades. "First, there is the supply-demand imbalance of
fresh water," he says. "Then there is the need for massive amounts of spending
to repair and replace aging water infrastructure. And then finally, there is
regulatory compliance. In the United States, for example, the Environmental
Protection Agency is continually casting increasingly strict water quality
standards, and water utilities and water treatment operators must upgrade and
improve their water treatment systems to meet these." Indeed, analysts report
that the funding gap for the country’s water infrastructure, some 700,000 miles
of pipe systems, is estimated to be $600 billion—$250 billion for drinking water
and $350 billion for wastewater. Moreover, at current renewal rates, governments
would need an estimated 900 years to replace that infrastructure.
Hedge funds and mutual funds that invest in the global water
industry are popping up like weeds. | Taking exposure to companies in positions to alleviate future
fresh water scarcity problems appears promising, because the demand for their
products and expertise will rise exponentially. Beyond infrastructure renewal,
companies engaged in building and operating desalination plants, in supplying
water cleaning and filtration systems, and in provisioning systems, such as
metering equipment, for demand-side management should also benefit from the
coming fresh water dearth.
While it may be easy to identify a large trend, profiting from
it becomes a bit more difficult. In the case of water, however, many people are
trying. Czarniak launched his firm’s water fund two years ago. It primarily
invests in small-cap companies operating in the water sector, and also takes
private equity stakes in certain firms. Investors in the fund can choose to
retain or leave aside the private equity segment as part of their personal
exposure.
Larger players, such as the Swiss firm Pictet, also offer
products, including a clutch of water-related funds. Pictet’s Water-P Distr
fund, for example, currently returns 26 percent annually. This fund invests in
large, well-known names such as French company Veolia Environment, international
services firm Suez and global conglomerate Nestlé. Most of the fund’s exposure
(almost 40 percent) is to the water supply and treatment sector, followed by the
water technology, environmental services and mineral water sectors. A large
vehicle like Pictet’s illustrates one of the advantages of buying into a fund:
The fee levels involved are much lower than those of a hedge fund. Pictet
charges a 1.6 percent annual management fee. A hedge fund will typically charge
a 2 percent management fee plus 20 percent of any upside the manager
produces.
|