![]() |
||||
| Risk & Reward | ||||
| Crude Investments
Eileen Gunn 11/01/2004 |
||||
Energy has been in the news quite a bit over the past few years,” observes Wil VanLoh, cofounder of Quantum Energy Partners, an energy private equity firm in Houston. “Brownouts in California, last year’s blackout in the Northeast, high heating prices in winter, rising prices at the gas pump. It’s all brought a lot of attention to oil company profits.” The price of crude oil has garnered its share of attention as well. Driven by rising global demand, aging supplies and uncertain global politics, oil prices continue their upward trajectory. Late this summer, crude futures for September delivery hit $44.15 a barrel, the first finish above $44 since investors started trading these contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange in 1983. Meanwhile, natural gas has reached new highs, topping $6 per million British thermal units through the spring and summer. It is no wonder then, that VanLoh and others in his field are now hearing from many would-be investors. While data on this small corner of the private equity world is hard to come by, VanLoh estimates that there has been more capital raised in the past three years than in the prior 10. New private equity funds that focus on small oil and natural gas companies are springing up daily, while existing funds are getting bigger. Quantum, for example, raised its first $100 million fund in 1998. Its most recent fund closed in March with $345 million. “We were oversubscribed by a factor of two,” VanLoh says.
Private equity firms, such as Quantum, Natural Gas Partners in Dallas and Lime Rock Partners in Westport, Conn., invest $15 million to $50 million in a portfolio company which, in turn, buys oil and gas properties from others and tries to lower their drilling costs. For example, one of Quantum’s companies recently bought a property from Chevron that produces about 2,000 barrels of oil a day. “That’s a rounding error to Chevron,” VanLoh notes. “But it was costing Chevron $18 million a year to operate it. Our guys got those costs down to $6 million, so that’s $12 million of improved cash flow right away.” The investors also hope their companies will locate more oil or gas than had been identified, or proven, at the time they bought the property (the real estate prices are based on proven reserves). After three to five years, the companies go public or merge with a larger company that is willing to pay for the increased cash flow they got out of their wells. “For any given well, it costs the same amount to get the oil out of the ground when it’s selling for $25 a barrel as it does when it’s selling for $40,” notes John Allen, a senior financial advisor with Merrill Lynch in Sacramento. “So oil is hot right now. If people can find it and produce it, they’re getting paid well for it.” Boom And Bust According to VanLoh, the investments Quantum made in the last three years have been the company’s best performers to date, a claim echoed by many in the energy equity arena these days. Yet despite such glowing reports, fund managers and, to some extent analysts and observers, advise against investing in oil and gas as a short-term flirtation with current high prices—particularly when the funds themselves have 10-year life spans. Energy companies and their investors have learned from the boom and bust cycles of the 1970s and early 1980s, Edmunds says, when wildcatters and bigger companies alike would “chase high prices, overexplore and overdrill, then go under when prices went bust.” Bill Weidner, managing director of Cosco Capital Management, an
Avon, Conn., investment bank specializing in energy, says that through the early
to mid-1990s, “companies bought properties assuming things would go up and down,
but would always revert to a mean of $18 a barrel. They had good discipline and
made money.” Now, with supply-and-demand trends pushing prices skyward,
conventional wisdom embraces a new, higher mean. Even so, he says, companies
reportedly are resisting using the latest highs to crunch their numbers.
“Companies are probably building their business models on $28 a barrel now. I’m
comfortable with $28.”
While the arguments in favor of restraint and consistent returns are sound, few deny the role sky-high oil prices have played in attracting investors and increasing returns. Most experts did not expect prices to go as high as they have, or as quickly, leaving some cautious about the long view. “The risk and reward balance has changed from a few years ago, from positive to neutral,” says William Quinn, a managing director with Natural Gas Partners in Dallas, which closed its seventh fund in March 2003 and manages more than $1.5 billion. “There is probably more room for prices to go down than up.” While that may be so, would-be energy investors should consider that overall demand is expected to remain high. In July, the International Energy Association in Paris estimated that global oil demand will grow by 2.9 percent this year, the biggest increase since 1980. It expects that pace to slow next year, but only to 2.2 percent.
The Long View Ultimately, even investors who are bullish on energy should hold out for management teams that take a restrained, long-term view. “You want to ask about their historical rates of return, the consistency of returns and the size of deals completed, and you want to see how those things have evolved,” Weidner says. “I would especially look at the track record through different price cycles for oil,” adds John Farber, a cofounder of Lime Rock Partners. It is also important to understand the types of companies in which a firm prefers to invest. Companies that buy proven reserves at the best prices will have more modest, but reliable, returns. Firms that focus on finding new streams here or abroad take on more risk, but the payoffs can be bigger if explorations are successful. Firms such as Lime Rock and First Reserve
seek security in diversification—they also invest in pipelines and oilfield
services. Service companies transport, store and process oil and gas or rent
field equipment. Their rates remain stable because they make money from the
volume of oil pumped, not the price at which it is traded. Farber cautions,
however, that if prices go down and there is less interest in drilling, some of
these companies might see their volumes decrease. |