Risk & Reward
Crude Investments
Eileen Gunn
11/01/2004

Energy has been in the news quite a bit over the past few years,” observes Wil VanLoh, cofounder of Quantum Energy Partners, an energy private equity firm in Houston. “Brownouts in California, last year’s blackout in the Northeast, high heating prices in winter, rising prices at the gas pump. It’s all brought a lot of attention to oil company profits.”

The price of crude oil has garnered its share of attention as well. Driven by rising global demand, aging supplies and uncertain global politics, oil prices continue their upward trajectory. Late this summer, crude futures for September delivery hit $44.15 a barrel, the first finish above $44 since investors started trading these contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange in 1983. Meanwhile, natural gas has reached new highs, topping $6 per million British thermal units through the spring and summer.

It is no wonder then, that VanLoh and others in his field are now hearing from many would-be investors. While data on this small corner of the private equity world is hard to come by, VanLoh estimates that there has been more capital raised in the past three years than in the prior 10. New private equity funds that focus on small oil and natural gas companies are springing up daily, while existing funds are getting bigger. Quantum, for example, raised its first $100 million fund in 1998. Its most recent fund closed in March with $345 million. “We were oversubscribed by a factor of two,” VanLoh says.

TOP VIEW
As crude oil prices climb due to rising demand and geopolitical instability, private equity stakes in gas-and oil-related companies offer an increasingly attractive investment opportunity. Though committing our assets to an industry that historically lives by boom and bust can be risky, we can reap impressive, if inconsistent, returns by seeking out companies positioned for the long term.
These private equity firms put most of their money to work in small oil and gas drilling ventures—called E&P (exploration and production) companies—though some also mix in pipeline companies and oil-related service and technology businesses. These smaller E&P companies are leaner and can make money on a smaller reserve than the big guys can, says Christopher Edmonds, the director of research at Pritchard Capital Partners, an investment firm in Atlanta that specializes in energy. “They’re usually trying to take advantage of an edge they have in technology or a particular interpretation of the geology in a place they know well,” he explains. This gives impetus to drill fields where the oil reserves had been too uncertain or inaccessible to pursue.

Private equity firms, such as Quantum, Natural Gas Partners in Dallas and Lime Rock Partners in Westport, Conn., invest $15 million to $50 million in a portfolio company which, in turn, buys oil and gas properties from others and tries to lower their drilling costs. For example, one of Quantum’s companies recently bought a property from Chevron that produces about 2,000 barrels of oil a day. “That’s a rounding error to Chevron,” VanLoh notes. “But it was costing Chevron $18 million a year to operate it. Our guys got those costs down to $6 million, so that’s $12 million of improved cash flow right away.”

The investors also hope their companies will locate more oil or gas than had been identified, or proven, at the time they bought the property (the real estate prices are based on proven reserves). After three to five years, the companies go public or merge with a larger company that is willing to pay for the increased cash flow they got out of their wells. “For any given well, it costs the same amount to get the oil out of the ground when it’s selling for $25 a barrel as it does when it’s selling for $40,” notes John Allen, a senior financial advisor with Merrill Lynch in Sacramento. “So oil is hot right now. If people can find it and produce it, they’re getting paid well for it.”

Boom And Bust
According to VanLoh, the investments Quantum made in the last three years have been the company’s best performers to date, a claim echoed by many in the energy equity arena these days. Yet despite such glowing reports, fund managers and, to some extent analysts and observers, advise against investing in oil and gas as a short-term flirtation with current high prices—particularly when the funds themselves have 10-year life spans. Energy companies and their investors have learned from the boom and bust cycles of the 1970s and early 1980s, Edmunds says, when wildcatters and bigger companies alike would “chase high prices, overexplore and overdrill, then go under when prices went bust.”

Bill Weidner, managing director of Cosco Capital Management, an Avon, Conn., investment bank specializing in energy, says that through the early to mid-1990s, “companies bought properties assuming things would go up and down, but would always revert to a mean of $18 a barrel. They had good discipline and made money.” Now, with supply-and-demand trends pushing prices skyward, conventional wisdom embraces a new, higher mean. Even so, he says, companies reportedly are resisting using the latest highs to crunch their numbers. “Companies are probably building their business models on $28 a barrel now. I’m comfortable with $28.”

New private equity funds that focus on small oil and natural gas companies are springing up daily, while existing funds are getting bigger.
To help investors hedge their bets, fund managers are encouraging companies to place long-term contracts that lock in a price slightly above what they need to break even. “We don’t want to take significant commodity price risk,” VanLoh says. “We’re trying to back guys who have a systematic way of building a business that will make money in all cycles.”

While the arguments in favor of restraint and consistent returns are sound, few deny the role sky-high oil prices have played in attracting investors and increasing returns. Most experts did not expect prices to go as high as they have, or as quickly, leaving some cautious about the long view. “The risk and reward balance has changed from a few years ago, from positive to neutral,” says William Quinn, a managing director with Natural Gas Partners in Dallas, which closed its seventh fund in March 2003 and manages more than $1.5 billion. “There is probably more room for prices to go down than up.”

While that may be so, would-be energy investors should consider that overall demand is expected to remain high. In July, the International Energy Association in Paris estimated that global oil demand will grow by 2.9 percent this year, the biggest increase since 1980. It expects that pace to slow next year, but only to 2.2 percent.

Questions to Ask Your Private Wealth Advisor About Oil and Gas Ventures

1. How have leading E&P funds performed relative to the rest of
my portfolio?

2. Of those funds requiring a 10-year commitment, which are best positioned to succeed in the long term?

3. How do management fees compare among leading oil and gas funds?

4. How quickly have the energy funds under consideration grown over the past three years?

5. Given current Treasury rates, would MLPs or bonds make a better investment?

In the meantime, domestic supplies continue to become scarcer and international supplies have the clouds of terrorism and political uncertainty hanging over them. “A portion of the premium that we’re seeing in prices is unrest,” Quinn maintains. “Something as simple as Tom Ridge saying that there could be an attack in the United States in the near term riles markets.” Some fund managers argue that the potent combination of strong demand and international unrest will keep prices high. Both factors are, however, unpredictable. If India and China, where oil consumption has soared, see their economic growth stall as suddenly as it did for other Asian tigers in the late 1990s, demand growth would fall quickly.

The Long View
Ultimately, even investors who are bullish on energy should hold out for management teams that take a restrained, long-term view. “You want to ask about their historical rates of return, the consistency of returns and the size of deals completed, and you want to see how those things have evolved,” Weidner says.

“I would especially look at the track record through different price cycles for oil,” adds John Farber, a cofounder of Lime Rock Partners.

It is also important to understand the types of companies in which a firm prefers to invest. Companies that buy proven reserves at the best prices will have more modest, but reliable, returns. Firms that focus on finding new streams here or abroad take on more risk, but the payoffs can be bigger if explorations are successful.

Firms such as Lime Rock and First Reserve seek security in diversification—they also invest in pipelines and oilfield services. Service companies transport, store and process oil and gas or rent field equipment. Their rates remain stable because they make money from the volume of oil pumped, not the price at which it is traded. Farber cautions, however, that if prices go down and there is less interest in drilling, some of these companies might see their volumes decrease.

Recently, fund managers have been under pressure to increase the size of their funds. Farber advises investors to examine how quickly prospective funds have recently grown, and by how much. “At some point it will fundamentally change your investment style,” he says. “If you grow aggressively without a strategic reason, that’s troublesome.”

In some ways, oil and gas funds are similar to other private equity plays. Investment minimums are usually $5 million, and most funds state they have a few affluent individuals investing alongside their institutional clients. VanLoh notes that some of his investment bank clients are investing money they have pooled together for their private banking customers. According to Glen Hill, a vice president of alternative investments at JP Morgan Private Bank in New York, it is reasonable to expect returns of 20 to 25 percent, with most of this return coming the last five years of the fund. Annual management fees are typically 1.5 percent, plus 20 percent of the profits.

Investment advisors and fund mangers alike recommend limiting energy investments to 2 to 3 percent of our assets— 4 percent for those of us who may be particularly bullish on oil. Edmonds counts himself among that group, at least until the headlines tell a different story. “You have a combination of higher price levels, calculated decisions on how to get the best overall returns and a better understanding of how to use technology to get the most out of the oil patch,” he says. “The private equity guys can sink their teeth into those things.”

Additional Information
Energy Alternatives: The Master Limited Partnership