|
|
 |
 |
| Features |
Comfort without Commitment
Michelle Seaton
07/01/2004
|
TOP VIEW Chartering a private aircraft is a cost-effective alternative to jet
ownership for those who travel up to 400 hours per year. Although the quality of
service is less consistently flawless than one experiences with fractional
ownership or membership clubs, charter requires no long-term
commitments or up-front fees. It also allows us to avoid the administrative
hassles of ownership, and the worries about capital gains or losses on our
aircraft investments. |
Fractious Competition For decades,
charter services have delivered similar value to business travelers who do not
fly enough to justify a full aircraft purchase, but whose lifestyles require
flexibility and precise time management. The chartered aircraft is the airborne
equivalent of a limousine that, for a fee, will pick up and transport travelers
just about anywhere, often to more obscure landing fields that commercial
aircraft do not service.
Long the favorite alternative to both commercial
airlines and privately owned jets, charter has, in the past decade, lost
significant market share to fractional operators who offer a seductive mix of
ownership, flexibility and comfort that proves fiscally compelling. Given his
financial profile and travel needs, Lemke would make an ideal fractional owner,
an idea he has considered and rejected. “I know people who own fractional shares
and are quite happy with them,” he says. “It’s just so much more expensive than
chartering planes when we need them. Fractional ownership does make sense for
some people, just not for me.”
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |