|
|
 |
 |
| Feature |
Risk & Reward Retrospective
John Ferry
01/01/2006
|
“Two
years ago, on a low-risk deal, the annualized rate of return would have been 4
to 6 percent. Now it’s 8 to 10 percent,” Orrico says. He adds that because
merger arbitrage is a nonleveraged strategy, rising short-term interest rates
have improved prospects relative to other hedge fund styles, which rely on
leverage and are sensitive to interest rates. “We’re finally at a point where,
not only is the deal flow rate good, but the risk-free rate of return is helping
us. So I’m cautiously optimistic, as long as we don’t see the economy stumble.”4. Bond Ladders Rung Out July 2004, page 88. Bond ladders, the fixed-income world’s answer to passive dollar-cost averaging,
were not as successful as dynamic trading strategies over the past two years at
wringing the most real return out of the flailing and flattening yield curve.
“It’s an interesting passive strategy,” notes Zane Brown, partner and director
of fixed income at Lord Abbett, a Jersey City, N.J., investment company. “But
active portfolio management is still likely to offer more value, and I think the
movement of the yield curve over the past 12 months reinforces that.”
THEN AND NOW Bond ladders have performed in line with expectations, despite the
flattening of the yield curve over the past 18 months, because losses at the
short end have been offset by gains in longer-tenor bonds. However, fixed-income
portfolio managers say they have beaten this passive strategy by taking
aggressive advantage of opportunities presented by the flattening. | As an
example, he notes, “In 2004 we emphasized buying securities beyond the five-year
area. Now we can go back and purchase the lower maturities at a much lower price
than was available.”
The bond ladder strategy, by contrast, is not designed
to identify market opportunities. It simply involves putting a like amount of
capital into each of a series of bonds with staggered maturities, using the
capital from bonds that mature to reinvest in new instruments. It is designed so
that periodically—typically either annually or biannually—the investor always
has a segment of the portfolio maturing. If you were to design a 10-year
laddered program, for example, you would divide the amount to be invested into
10 equal portions and buy bonds that mature in each of the 10 years. As one set
of bonds matures, they are replaced automatically with another set of 10-year
bonds, rather like climbing a maturity ladder.
As Worth went to press,
increases in the Federal Reserve’s short-term lending rate has made these
securities cheaper to buy. However, these pressures have not pushed up rates at
or beyond the 10-year section of the curve. A year ago, the 10-year Treasury was
trading at 4.24 percent, but its yield has since fallen to 4.14 percent, while
the three-month Treasury rate has gone up by around 1.85 percentage
points.
This yield curve flattening has been mostly a wash in terms of the
performance of bond ladders. In aggregate, the prices of the short-term
securities in the ladder portfolio have fallen, but the long-term securities
have gone up a bit in value. “So on a net basis, I don’t think [the flattening]
should have affected the ladder itself,” Brown notes.
5. Timber Investments Wooden Performance August 2004, page 86. Timber has been the darling of private client
investment
strategists for the last several years, but there are now concerns
over
its reliance on demand from the increasingly tepid housing sector. Despite
this, in 2004 and 2005 timber investments continued to perform well and
exhibited very low volatility.
“Fundamentals appear to be
relatively well
balanced, and absent any shock to the system, we expect
that to continue,” notes
Kurt Akers, director of research for Global
Forest Partners, a timber investment
management organization (TIMO)
that raised a $300 million fund in early 2004.
“While housing might
decline in a cyclical manner, we believe that demographics
are positive
over the long term,” he adds. “Also, the impact of Hurricane
Katrina
could be positive for the sector, given the amount of rebuilding that
will be necessary.”
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |