REIT investors are also dismayed to find that technical factors
cause the market prices to diverge from the actual values of their real estate
assets. In the last several years, U.S. REITs have traded in a range from a 25
percent discount to their net-asset value to a 25 percent premium, depending on
investor sentiment, Reid says. However, since REITs tend to throw off bondlike
cash flows, they tend to be less volatile than the broader equity markets. REIT backers also tout the level of price disclosure and
transparency the instruments bring to the property market. In their absence, the
market would suffer from the same lack of portfolio transparency and performance
data that dogs other alternative asset classes. "As publicly traded companies,
[U.S. REITs] are required by regulatory agencies to file standardized financial
reports and to follow generally accepted accounting principles," says Michael
Grupe, executive vice president of research and investor outreach for the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, a trade group in
Washington. They are also scrutinized by investment analysts. REIT markets in
other developed economies have similar disclosure requirements, and investors
can expect comparable regulatory and analyst scrutiny. However, investors in
emerging-market REITs may have to settle for less. The Direct Method The diversified portfolios backing REITs reduce risk, but also
dampen returns. Investors with higher risk tolerances and access to outstanding
real estate investment expertise may prefer to shoulder bigger risks in the
pursuit of making outsized returns. Peter Smedvig, the patriarch of the Norwegian oil drilling
family, set up his own private equity firm, Smedvig Capital, in 1996 to invest
his family’s money. To date, the business has committed more than $250 million
to over 50 investments, and is in the process of partnering with Protego Real
Estate Investors to set up a fund that will invest in properties throughout
Europe. John Hewett, Smedvig Capital’s chief executive and cofounder, says the
crucial factor is finding best-in-class property managers. "Here, it’s about being led by the
right individuals rather than being led by the right product," he says. While
Smedvig has avoided emerging-market property investments to date, Hewett
believes the firm will expand in that direction once it finds the appropriate
expertise. "That is something that we are starting to take a look at with
third-party managers," he says. Setting up a firm to pursue property investments makes sense
only for those with significant family wealth, like the Smedvigs. But there are
a host of third-party private equity outfits pursuing international property
investments. One is McKinley Reserve, a specialist in emerging market
developments, based in Hilbert, Wis. McKinley’s subsidiaries develop major
property initiatives, often in conjunction with host governments. Todd Thiel,
its chief executive, says McKinley is working on developments in Jamaica and
Dubai. McKinley aims to provide investors annual returns of more than 20
percent, Thiel says. "You don’t get those kinds of returns without stepping into
a world that’s a little foggy, but we like to think we have the ability to
mitigate that risk," he says. "You don’t get those kinds of returns without stepping into a world that’s a little
foggy." –Todd Thiel | Those seeking vehicles with more liquidity than traditional private equity firms, but who want
access to the best fund managers, may consider unlisted funds. "Someone with an
investment portfolio in the hundreds of millions of dollars will have the option
of investing in some of the funds managed by large firms like Goldman Sachs or
Morgan Stanley," Blank says.
|