![]() |
|||
| Best Practices: Real Estate | |||
| Landed Class
Elizabeth Harris 02/01/2007 |
|||
Craig Jones, an agent with John R. Wood Realtors in Naples, Fla., knew most buyers would pass on the $1.7 million home she represented last year before she even put it on the market. The sellers’ sense of style was, euphemistically speaking, memorable: dayglow pink and blue wallpaper and fabrics, featuring parrots and hibiscus. This, combined with many contemporary fixtures in an architecturally traditional home, seemed to repel buyers. In fact, after three months on the market without so much as a nibble, the owners were forced to offer a $40,000 credit to potential buyers. “The sellers did not want to wait for the one person who had their taste to walk in,” she says. The owners of
this highly personalized property learned that at the high end of the
residential real estate market, some homes carry a broader, more timeless appeal
than others, and these are the ones that appreciate more quickly. “If it creates
a custom look that is so taste-specific you cannot get broad appeal, you have
got to do something,” Jones says. To maximize potential return on an eight-figure home investment, buyers must walk a fine line: Their properties should be unique, but not too individualized. They should possess architectural, aesthetic and other attributes that are memorable, but not so trendy that they will quickly become dated. Finally, they must have an attractive location and grounds that afford both privacy and security. Michelle Mayne, an attorney and real estate investor, has struck the right balance. Her home in Reno, Nev., combines the modern designs of architect David Chavez with ample land for her horses. Her Vail, Colo., home at Beavercreek has a view that National Geographic would publish, she says. Meanwhile, the sound of lapping water at her home on the shores of Lake Tahoe endears it to her. “I’ve never seen any of the properties I’ve had depreciate,” she adds. Mayne searches out unusual homes in unusual locations, which, she says, make solid investments. “They’re insulated from the ebb and flow of the real estate market.”
Other investors in this market are not fairing as well. In 2005, there were 109,113 homes that sold for $1 million or higher—more than 10 times the number sold in 1999, according to Laurie Moore-Moore, president of the Institute for Luxury Home Marketing in Dallas. Yet, even this market niche, which is not as volatile as the market for less costly homes, is softening. Although the National Association of Realtors does not track sales specifically in the high-end market, Moore-Moore says that buyers are growing pickier over architectural design and neighborhoods, with the expectation that overall prices may remain flat over the near term in some regions. In this slackening market, two features can improve the odds of a continuous rate of appreciation: lot size and location. It is axiomatic that an estate situated on several hundred rural acres will only become more valuable over time. Furthermore, homes near dedicated open spaces, such as land preserves, or those that abut other larger properties also hold a distinct cachet in the market. However, in more densely developed areas, land values become more relative and are gauged by the size of the lot in relation to that of nearby parcels. “For the flats of Beverly Hills, three-quarters of an acre and up is considered big,” says Joyce Rey, who heads the estates division of Coldwell Banker Previews International in Los Angeles. Land means privacy and security, and owners of luxury homes will pay top dollar for both. Realtor Shari Chase, president and CEO of Nevada-based Chase International, attributes much of the $100 million value for one property she represents to its unusually large size. It comprises 210 acres—waterfront on Lake Tahoe as well as a separate small, private lake, and it borders land owned and managed by the state. “Anyone can go out and buy bricks and mortar,” Chase says. “The number one thing is really your setting.” Real estate experts caution, however, that a home with a view of the water will be more desirable than direct waterfront for home shoppers who wish to avoid any associated maintenance. Realtor Laura Duggan, who runs West Austin Properties
in Texas, represents clients offering that magic combination of location,
landscape and features: 10.5 acres overlooking Lake Austin, with 500 feet of
waterfront, for $13.5 million—a high price, even for this desirable area. Yet
Duggan thinks that despite a slowing national market, the sellers will have no
difficulty getting this price because the estate is private and features a
heliport and separate staff quarters. The neighbors, too, are unlikely to
intrude. Michael Dell owns 1,500 acres on the other shore, and he’s not likely
to develop it, Duggan says. “You’re always going to have privacy.”
Buyers
should also assess the neighborhood. Desirable streets and coveted blocks of
similar-size and maintained homes will enhance value. However, investors should
avoid a relatively new urban phenomenon: the “McMansion” in aging neighborhoods.
As interest rates plummeted in recent years, developers bought modest midcentury
homes on big lots, replacing them with large, luxurious houses that were
inconsistent with the architectural style of the neighborhood. When interest
rates began to rise, construction slowed, leaving investors who had envisioned a
neighborhood gentrification stranded in suburbia. Owners might pour money into
renovating or even rebuilding a house, thinking it will be worth $5 million. But
if it is in an $800,000 neighborhood, the sellers will not receive $5 million,
says Barbara Candee, a director with Daniel Gale Sotheby’s International Realty
on New York’s Long Island. And, of course, bad taste seems to have the opposite
effect. In the fall of 2006, Duggan showed a client a 12,217-square-foot,
medieval-style home built on the Barton Creek golf course in Austin. The
prospective buyer admired the custom stonework, knights-in-armor standing in
Gothic archways and elaborate wrought-iron torches, but declined to make an
offer on the $9.75 million house. Duggan was not surprised. “There are only so
many people who want to live in a medieval castle,” she says.
Illustration by Edwin Fotheringham. |