 |
Jeff Sullivan never expected to be president of his family’s company, nor did
he really want the job. He was happy to leave the battles with his father over
management decisions, expansion plans and capital outlays to his older brother,
Jay. “I thought, ‘I’m the second kid; what do I have to worry about?’ ” Jeff
recalls.
The question tempted fate. Like many other members of the second
generations of entrepreneurial families, Jeff would soon find that his life was
inextricably entwined with the fortunes of, and conflicts within, his family’s
business.
TOP VIEW Children who are born to successful entrepreneurs face unique challenges as they
strive to define themselves in both their professional and personal lives. This
second generation often finds itself competing for attention with that other
very demanding child, the family business. Adult children of entrepreneurs often
find their fates remain tied to the fortunes of the family business, and their
need to strike out and establish their own identities may conflict with the entrepreneur’s desire to remain in control. | Jim Sullivan, the family patriarch and a hard-driven entrepreneur,
bought Dallas-based Sutton, Steele & Steele in the late 1960s, when the
company was in freefall. He renamed it Triple/S Dynamics, and over time built it
into a leading manufacturer of conveyor belts and industrial screens, with $12
million in annual sales.
Jeff joined Triple/S in 1982, just a year and a
half after graduating from college. By 2001, he had reached his mid-40s with a
child, a mortgage and a stalled career. He felt trapped in his job and
frustrated by the way his father (and boss) habitually second-guessed his
decisions. His father had promised to make Jay the company’s president, but like
many business founders, he was loath to discuss stepping down. “The way we
handled succession was to pretend it wouldn’t be an issue,” Jeff
explains.
Jim had always promised his sons that he would retire at the age of
65, but that birthday came and went with no sign he planned to yield control.
Then he promised he would go at 68. But as Jim turned 70, his sons found him
still coming to the office at 8 am, seven days a week, and micro-managing his
business.
Jeff understands his father’s desire to stay active. Like many
entrepreneurs, Jim loved his creation and, in many ways, defined himself by its
success. “From my dad’s perspective, he is thinking: ‘What am I supposed to do,
go off and die? I love my kids, but I’m not going to go out to pasture.’ ” Jeff
saw no viable way to improve his own situation while his father remained in full
control. “It never crossed my mind that I could leave,” he admits. “And that’s
not healthy.”
Sibling Rivalry Like Jeff, children of successful entrepreneurs often feel
trapped—either because the founder is unwilling to cede control or because they
themselves are ambivalent about their role in the family business. Family
business counselors say that before heirs such as Jeff and Jay Sullivan can
confront a parent about issues such as succession, they must recognize the role
that the business has played in their families, and how they feel about
it. “For most founders, the business they create is their favorite child,”
says Bill Provett, facilitator at the Family Business Institute in Raleigh, N.C.
“The kids have seen dad taking care of the favorite child, spending all of his
time and all of his energy on it.” Provett says that children internalize the
sacred status of the business as a result. They may also come to loath the idea
of joining the business, because they see how much their father has to work, and
how the business consumes him.
“The business literally takes a seat at the
dinner table, and the kids either hate it or love it from early on,” says Fredda
Herz Brown, managing partner at the Metropolitan Group in Cresskill, N.J., a consulting company that counsels entrepreneurial families on generational
conflicts. “The parent’s emotional need to perpetuate the business gets
introduced early on.” Members of the second generation can see their role in the
family as contingent upon their role in the business. Jeff found this to be the
case. “I didn’t think I could leave the company. It wasn’t even an issue of
loyalty. You just don’t stop being someone’s son.”
Jeff and his brother felt
trapped and increasingly unhappy. When the economy was shaken in September 2001,
the company’s sales plummeted. The crisis forced the family to reconsider the
company’s future and allowed Jeff, for the first time, to begin to envision a
path for himself that did not include the family business. “The day I realized
that I could go do something else—sell bananas, or anything else for that
matter—that was a real shift for me. I could say to my dad: ‘We’re going to
solve this or I’m out of here.’ ”
Ultimately, the Sullivans hired consultant
Jim Hutcheson of Regeneration Partners in Dallas to broker a succession plan,
which relieved tension on all sides. Hutcheson had worked with other clients on
succession issues like those that bedeviled the Sullivans. The founder who
refuses to exit gracefully is a common problem, he says. “Work gives them a
reason to get out of bed in the morning.”
Looking back on the experience
now, Jeff wishes he had taken control of his destiny earlier. He could have
worked elsewhere for a while to gain experience and confidence. He could have
challenged his father earlier and threatened to quit if he was not free to make
his own decisions and mistakes. He could have given himself permission to
leave.
In the Wake of a Titan Often, it takes a crisis of some kind to bring the
issues to a head and to force the founder to recognize that the time to leave
center stage is nearing. However, a family business succession is not the
product of dispassionate corporate executives considering tactics with
professional sangfroid. The architects of these plans have both a professional
and emotional stake in their success.
They are also, typically,
strong-willed individuals. Builders of successful businesses are often absentee
parents who have taken enormous financial risks—and won. Their children do not
just know the story of the family’s success, they have watched it unfold. Like
Jeff, they may feel unable to challenge their larger-than-life parents on
anything. “The children of entrepreneurs have enormous admiration for their
fathers, because they sat right there and have seen what was sacrificed to
create the business,” explains Leslie Mayer, CEO of Mayer Leadership Group, a
consulting firm in Wayne, Pa., that advises CEOs on leadership issues. They
admire their parent’s sacrifice, even if that included their relationship with
their children and any possibility of a normal home life, Mayer adds. “They are
not allowed to feel disappointment for what they didn’t get. They get the
message that they should feel part of the sacrifice that made the business
possible.”
Successful entrepreneurs are winners, Hutcheson notes. “They have
organized their lives so that they succeed in spite of everything.” Rarely do
their children have, or need, that drive. When the child of a successful
entrepreneur enters the family business and prepares to take charge, he or she
can feel inadequate to the task, even if better educated than the
founder.
| Members of the second generation can see their role in the family as contingent
upon their role in the business. | “They try and emulate dad, but they can’t,” Provett notes. “If they
entered the business at age 30, well, he entered the business before they were
born. They can’t know everything he knows and everyone he knows. When they try,
they are doomed to failure.” For Richard, the son of a newspaper publisher in the Southwest, the feeling
of inadequacy was reinforced everywhere he looked. “My father was tremendously
popular with his employees,” he says. “I was Little Richie, who used to get
stuck in the doors when I came to visit the office because I wasn’t strong
enough to open them. I was an adopted son in a family of extremely smart people.
My dad was Phi Beta Kappa in college and an extremely dynamic person. I was a
good athlete but a poor student, and couldn’t compete with him intellectually.”
Richard did not feel up to the job of running a newspaper and overseeing the
other family properties. He was also afraid the company’s employees would sense
his fear and lose what little respect they had for him. When Richard joined the
paper, his father devised a training program that rotated him every six months
through a series of departments. “I knew I was in the spotlight with everyone
watching what I did. Some people saw me as a way to get messages to my dad.
Others felt that they needed to make me learn the hard way,” he recalls.
A
few years after he joined the family business, Richard’s father fell ill, which
caused him to rely more heavily on his son. “He promoted me to associate
publisher and was complimentary to me on my work, but, really, I didn’t even
report to him anymore. I had my own budget and full authority,” Richard
remembers. His father died soon after, but his son continued to feel inadequate,
even years later. Employees continued to talk about his father, and some even
claimed that they had seen and spoken with his ghost. Richard laughs about it
now, and sees it as a testament to his father’s charisma, but for years it was
an unwelcome reminder of the differences between the two men. Harvard vs. Hard Knocks Members of the second generation often attempt to offset their lack of real-world
experience with knowledge and perspective. The heirs of entrepreneurs may have
studied business in college or even graduate school, while the founder often
learned everything he knows in the marketplace. “The second generation is the
first to get some formal education related to business processes and strategy.
In some situations the business founder is beaming, saying, ‘Here is my son who
is going to teach us,’ ” says Leslie Mayer, CEO of Mayer Leadership Group. “But
in many cases the founder will be incredibly threatened, and will put down any
ideas coming from academia. This is very frustrating to the second generation,
having gone out into the world to gather resources, not being able to use them
to influence the founder. It’s fertile territory for power issues in the
business, entrepreneurial superiority versus educational superiority.” Illustration by Jonathan Barkat. Back to Main Article: Wrestling for Control of the Business
Additional Information
The Big
Picture
The
Daughter's Dilemma
|