subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Estate Planning /
Trusts
Estate Tools for the Trusting
Thomas M. Kostigen
02/02/2004


Even so, if the Strangi decision is upheld on appeal (the case is still before the courts), RMAs may look better and better. Citigroup Private Bank has an offering currently in the works, and Handler points out that trust companies are bringing themselves quickly up to speed on the product. Of course, some warn that RMAs may not hold up to IRS scrutiny. "There is no court case that says people are allowed to do them," notes James Brockardt at Wharton Valuation Associates in Princeton, N.J. However, even without an overt government blessing, Handler and others insist RMAs will be less subject to the IRS’s control strictures than are family limited partnerships. RMAs have binding agreements stipulating control and discretionary issues. "It’s truly arm’s length," Handler emphasizes. "Limited partnerships bear special scrutiny with the IRS because they are intrafamily arrangements subject to special scrutiny."

RMA backers also say they afford valuable flexibility in structuring an estate plan. "From a tax perspective, you can transfer at death or during life," Handler says. If you want to transfer assets to your children during your lifetime, you divide an RMA in two, he explains. Each account remains subject to the provisions of the original master account, so a child would have to wait out the term established when the account was opened before taking control of the assets. This has an additional benefit, Handler notes, "of kids not being able to go off and trade their account away."

RMA backers argue that they have other useful applications. These instruments can be used to extend the tax benefits of an individual retirement account, for example. IRAs defer taxes on investment gains until a person reaches 70.5 years of age and is forced to withdraw the assets. "If you have an IRA, and you take $8 million and put it in an RMA, then you shrink the value of the IRA," Fox observes. "Then the value of what you would have to take out would be reduced, and the transfer taxes would be reduced also."
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Structures for Success
» 10 Questions for Your Private Banker - 8/04
» 10 Questions for Your Private Banker - 5/05
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference