subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Estate Planning /
Best Practices
Trust Busting
Fran Hawthorne
05/02/2005


Jeff Stuerman, vice president at A.G. Edwards in St. Louis, explains that if a beneficiary removes a corporate trustee, he must typically replace the trustee with another corporate entity. “This is a protection for the family against, for example, an 18-year-old beneficiary naming his buddy as trustee,” Stuerman says, “and telling him, ‘Give all the money in my trust to me.’” He recommends that beneficiaries start by simply asking a trustee to resign, because most corporate trustees will not want to remain in a relationship that might become difficult to manage.

There are, however, exceptions to this simple scenario. “I’ve seen a few cases where, because of the amount of assets under management in a given trust, trustees are reluctant to give up their post,” says Shiller. “Usually, these conflicts end up in court.”

Going to court is, unfortunately, the other well-known option for taking control of trusts. This tactic is commonly reserved as a last resort, however, because it can cast family trust quarrels into the public eye—and it offers no guarantee of a satisfactory outcome. A beneficiary simply telling a judge he does not like the trustee is usually insufficient to convince a judge to change the provisions of a trust. “Courts are often reluctant to call a professional trustee on the carpet or to get in the middle of a family squabble,” Shiller says. Beneficiaries are forced to make a substantive complaint against the trustee, such as showing that a trustee failed to abide by the terms of the trust, played favorites with certain beneficiaries or committed outright malfeasance. A beneficiary might be able to claim that a trustee made poor investment decisions, but that requires proving that he made inappropriate investments, not just lousy returns in a down market.

Ten states—California, Illinois and New Hampshire among them—allow beneficiaries to remove trustees for more nebulous reasons, such as a lack of cooperation that substantially impairs the administration of the trust or persistent failure to effectively administer the trust. But even under the most favorable laws and provisions, firing a trustee carries with it a fair amount of bureaucracy and costs. “Every time a trustee leaves a relationship, the trustee is entitled to have an audit,” notes Fiduciary Trust’s Cohen. “You’re trying to cut off any lawsuits.” Transferring the paperwork will take four to eight weeks—not counting any delays due to litigation. The total cost—which generally is paid by the trust—can range from a few thousand dollars to $10,000 and up if the parties go to court. Some trustees may also insist on a termination fee, which might come to 1 percent of the assets in trust.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» The Business of Trust Busting
» Sentinels or Swindlers?
» Capable Key-Masters
» Trust Tutorials
» Passing On, Passing Over
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference