subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Estate Planning /
Best Practices: Taxes
Mind the Gaps
Gayle B. Ronan
07/01/2005

But in order to maximize the benefits of the gift exclusion, some have been granting powers to extended family members, raising eyebrows on the joint committee. This enables the wealth holder to gift much larger sums into the trust each year and remove the assets from the estate. The JCT seems unclear as to whether it wants to eliminate or reduce this perceived abuse. The proposal presents three options, only the first of which seems workable.

Option 1 would limit who could be a recipient by requiring that the holder of a Crummey power be a direct beneficiary of the trust.

Option 2 would defeat the purpose of the trust altogether by giving the holder, who may or may not be an ultimate beneficiary of the trust, a lifetime right to withdraw the gift.

Option 3 would require no prior agreement that the gift recipient will not withdraw funds from the trust.

“Even if the estate tax were to be repealed, people would still seek relief from gift taxes on lifetime transfers, and this would tighten things up,” says Charles D. Fox IV, a partner in the Chicago office of Schiff Hardin. “But in reality, most people already draft trusts in accordance with Option 1.”

Thomas P. Cavanaugh, an estate and trust attorney with Cox, Hodgman & Giarmarco in Troy, Mich., agrees that even if the number of Crummey beneficiaries were limited, that would merely detour planning. He notes that trust grantors already use a tactic if they have a shortage of potential beneficiaries for gifts that qualify for the $11,000 per person per year gift tax exemption. “In that event,” he says, “Mom and Dad lend money to the Crummey trust to fund the premium.”

Furthermore, Congress would have to face down a powerful Crummey beneficiary: the insurance lobby, which helped quash a similar proposal to do away with Crummey trusts a decade ago.

Gayle Ronan, a former private banker, writes about wealth management. ronan1@comcast.net

Illustration by Ken Orvidas.

Additional Information
Uncharitable Recommendations
1 | 2 | 3 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» The Collector's Conundrum
» Estate Tax Anxieties
» Guarded Optimism
» To Give and Receive
» The Lure of Dynasty Trusts
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference