subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Estate Planning /
Best Practices: Family Business
Mortal Combat
Kris Frieswick
01/01/2006

Partners avoid drafting these agreements for a variety of reasons. Some claim they do not have the time or money to invest in drafting a comprehensive document, including a buy-sell agreement. Others may want to avoid the emotionally charged conversations that can result. “At the start of a partnership, people are in love,” says Abraham Rudy, a business litigation attorney at Weissmann, Wolff, Bergman, Coleman, Grodin & Evall in Beverly Hills, Calif. “The last thing they want to be forced to think about is, ‘What if I get upset? What happens if you or I steal something? If we split up, who gets the typewriter?’”

Partnership agreements often fail to contemplate the many scenarios that can befall a partnership during, and after, the lifetime of its members. But when partners do finally sit down to write up partnership and buy-sell agreements, they must remember one overriding principal: No one knows who will die first, so the agreements apply to every partner—and to the spouses. “Whatever you want to do for your spouse, you better be ready to do the same thing for your partners’ spouses,” explains Paul Vogel, CEO and president of Enterprise Trust, the St. Louis asset management division of Enterprise Financial Services. “Sometimes partners forget that these agreements go both ways.”

Values and Valuation
Buy-sell agreements are the centerpiece of any plan designed to protect the interests of both surviving partners and the spouse of the deceased in the event of a partner’s death. Such agreements attempt to balance the desire of a spouse to receive quick and fair compensation for a husband’s or wife’s life work, with the company’s need to stay solvent.

The core of the buy-sell agreement is the company valuation. Partners must decide who will estimate the value of the company, the evaluation method (for example, whether cash flow and goodwill will be factored into the equation) and whether or not a liquidity discount will be applied to the deceased partner’s share. Such discounts often apply when a share would be particularly difficult to sell to an unrelated third party, which is one of the standards against which fair market value is judged. “The more specificity you have about the methodology, the more you’ll have agreement over the basis for the valuation, and there will be less opportunity for disagreements down the road,” advises Jay Rosenbaum, a partner at the law firm of Edwards Angell Palmer and Dodge in Boston.

Some companies assign book value as the valuation methodology, but that has fallen out of favor with many firms, primarily because the IRS assumes that most sellers will insist upon fair market value. In fact, the IRS taxes the transfer of assets in family partnerships at fair value, regardless of what method was used to calculate the payout. “The IRS assumes that a third party would be more diligent in getting full value than a family member,” Rosenbaum adds.

Buy-sell agreements also stipulate how the purchase of the spouse’s share will be financed. Some companies purchase a life insurance policy for each of its partners that funds, in whole or in part, the payout of that partner’s share in the event of death. Often, that policy payout serves as a down payment, with the bulk of the payments coming in the form of a promissory note. The note outlines the terms of installment payments over time.

In some cases, a partnership may not have the cash needed to buy out a spouse, now or in the future, leaving it with no other choice but to make the spouse a partner. This is usually the last-resort option for both partners and the spouse. Many state statutes give the surviving spouse the right to ownership of the late partner’s share, and rights to the income from the partnership, but not managerial rights. Such an arrangement presents a number of problems, primarily that the spouse will be subject to taxation on the distribution of the profits from the partnership, even if the those profits are rolled back into the business.
1 | 2 | 3 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Ladder Of Succession
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference