subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Estate Planning /
Best Practices: Estate Planning
Paradise Lost
Louise Kramer
12/01/2005

Andrew Lee, a tax and estate planning attorney at Howard & Howard in Bloomfield Hills, Mich., has seen numerous estate plans that overlook the way posterity will run the vacation home. Families imagine it will always be the place where worldly pressures end, when in reality, when it passes to the next generation, it becomes a family business. As with almost any business, it only develops more layers of complexity as time passes and an increasing number of relatives become stakeholders in the property—spouses, children and the children’s children, some of whom may not know each other well. “You can have 30 people trying to chime in about everything,” Lee says. “Management is the biggest issue.”

Lee encourages his clients, as they are thinking about the terms of their estate plans, to ask their children point-blank if they really want to own a share of the vacation home. Everyone must be open-minded because this is an emotionally fraught question; in many families the children are afraid their parents will be crushed if they reject the scene of so many happy memories. It might turn out that one child hates the five-hour drive. Another might prefer to build his own dream retreat thousands of miles away. If only one child truly wants the property, Lee suggests the parents apportion their other assets so that all heirs feel they have received a fair share of the estate, assuming the parents want to split their estate evenly.

If siblings are going to share the property, however, trust and estate lawyers will almost always advise the parents to create a legal entity to hold the property. In most cases a limited liability company is the preferred structure for keeping all family members invested in the project. Parents who are concerned that their children will not be able to manage the property without an overseer can set up a vacation home trust. As with all trusts, however, the terms will be difficult and expensive to amend. Another drawback is that a trust expires when the last person named in it dies, thus leaving later generations connected to the house—at which point, they might be distant cousins—with no legal requirement to abide by the trust agreement. Unless they are savvy enough to start over with their own business strategy, chaos may blow the roof off, quite literally.

Within either structure, parents can minimize the estate tax if they start transferring shares of the property to the next generation early on. The government currently allows individuals to make an annual exclusion gift valued at $11,000 per recipient. Each parent can make this gift, and the gift can additionally be made to the recipient’s spouse and children.

Operating Agreeably
Chris Sega, a partner in Venable, a law firm in Washington, D.C., and a professor of tax and estate law at Georgetown University Law Center, frequently helps families create a formal operating agreement that will govern all procedures, right down to the minutiae that can set siblings at war. (“You used my ski boat without asking!”)

It might start as part of the agenda at a family meeting and include input from everyone who will be a partner in the property. But Huggins, in the guidebook that came from his personal experience, cautions that it can take two to three years to work out an agreement that covers all  the details. After all, the existing informal agreement evolved over many years, perhaps over several generations. Huggins shakes his head now over his family’s lack of an official set of rules and procedures, believing that if they had managed the property better, his children would be able to enjoy it even now. “You can do all sorts of planning about legal and financial issues,” he says. “But if your kids and your kids’ kids can’t get along, and there are arguments about who uses it and who pays for it, all the work of the lawyers is not going to pay off.”

Inevitably, one of the thorniest issues that an operating agreement should address is the actual schedule of who gets to use the house and when. The family should consider, and spell out, rules such as at what age a child becomes entitled to use the house alone, and whether there should be open weeks for the entire family to gather.
1 | 2 | 3 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» A Vital Dialogue
» 100 Year Plan Introduction: Making Meaning of Wealth Across Generations
» Deep in the Heart
» Provincial Planning
» 100 Year Plan Part III: The Practice of Charity
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference