The Jones
family office had developed some lax habits. It had never set up a standardized
system for administrative processes. Tasks such as recording cash receipts and
disbursements, account transfers and check reconciliation fell to whomever was
available to take care of the job when it came up. The investment transactions
were not being properly authorized or consistently reported.
A makeover, like any in-depth analysis, often prods the client into
making tough decisions. |
Solving
these problems was a matter of getting the office organized. We helped the
Joneses establish a process for recording cash. We advised them to designate
dual signature authority for checks or wires over a specific amount. We
recommended that they develop a written policies and procedures manual,
including processes to follow in case of any given individual’s absence. We
suggested that they take important paper files—scattered in a room that was not
fireproof—and convert them to digital files that would be protected by a
password and organized for easy access.
A more serious issue was the way the
Joneses were operating with the president as the only person with power of
attorney over all the trusts and business entities; he simply had too much
control over the family wealth. We said this authority should be divided among
several people, partly because even family members should be subject to checks
and balances, but also because every family office should have others who can
step in if something should happen to the president. This particular family
office head was not threatened by our injunction; in fact, he embraced our
suggestions because he was concerned about his fiduciary
liabilities.
The Joneses had an informal board of
directors voting on issues, but did not have a document to clearly define its
responsibilities. Nor did board members and trustees have liability insurance.
Each trust had two trustees, both family members. This meant that family members
with fiduciary power were making decisions for, in some cases, distant cousins,
many of whom were children. Someday these beneficiaries could decide that the
board and trustees had acted improperly in not preserving their capital and sue
them. We recommended that they consider adding a professional trustee to each
trust, get insurance for the board and trustees and, most importantly, consult
their lawyers.
Toward Outsourcing The concerns about the expense of the family office
were unfounded. It was serving a number of important functions, including
monitoring investments and creating economies of scale for the family so they
could access otherwise unavailable investments and advisors. While most of the
personnel were necessary to this effort, we did recommend that the work of two
in-house accountants be outsourced. We advised the family to at least outsource
tax return review and planning to a tax CPA who could provide fresh ideas, avoid
penalties and communicate regulatory changes.
A makeover, like any in-depth
analysis, often prods the client into making tough decisions. At other times our
advice just reinforces what a client suspected all along. We recently conducted
an assessment for another smaller family office with a manager who was a lawyer.
The manager had been handling back-office functions, preparing tax returns and
overseeing investments. He was, besides being overextended, not the
best-qualified investment advisor out there; the family’s portfolios were not
performing as well as they should have been. We found that this family office
would be much better off outsourcing most of the functions. They took our
suggestion and set up a virtual family office, with just one part-time employee
to manage bill payment, social calendars and other lifestyle concerns. Instead
of mediocre results, the family is now served by best-in-class investment, tax
and legal professionals.
Most family offices do not start with a business
plan. Family members simply get involved with various ventures and the
institution evolves. I have often seen family offices that seem like a
voluminous extension of the founding family member’s desk at home—full of
unorganized paper. For that reason, I tell clients to refer to their family
office with a corporate code name; you don’t have to make it official, but try
calling it something like the Jones Family Enterprise when you talk about it
with family members and employees. It is amazing how this helps you see the
family office as the business organization that it is.
|