subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Business & Entrepreneurship /
First Person: Industry View
Extreme Makeover
Mark J. Blumenthal
01/01/2006

The Jones family office had developed some lax habits. It had never set up a standardized system for administrative processes. Tasks such as recording cash receipts and disbursements, account transfers and check reconciliation fell to whomever was available to take care of the job when it came up. The investment transactions were not being properly authorized or consistently reported.

A makeover, like any in-depth analysis, often prods the client
into making tough decisions.

Solving these problems was a matter of getting the office organized. We helped the Joneses establish a process for recording cash. We advised them to designate dual signature authority for checks or wires over a specific amount. We recommended that they develop a written policies and procedures manual, including processes to follow in case of any given individual’s absence. We suggested that they take important paper files—scattered in a room that was not fireproof—and convert them to digital files that would be protected by a password and organized for easy access.

A more serious issue was the way the Joneses were operating with the president as the only person with power of attorney over all the trusts and business entities; he simply had too much control over the family wealth. We said this authority should be divided among several people, partly because even family members should be subject to checks and balances, but also because every family office should have others who can step in if something should happen to the president. This particular family office head was not threatened by our injunction; in fact, he embraced our suggestions because he was concerned about his fiduciary liabilities.

The Joneses had an informal board of directors voting on issues, but did not have a document to clearly define its responsibilities. Nor did board members and trustees have liability insurance. Each trust had two trustees, both family members. This meant that family members with fiduciary power were making decisions for, in some cases, distant cousins, many of whom were children. Someday these beneficiaries could decide that the board and trustees had acted improperly in not preserving their capital and sue them. We recommended that they consider adding a professional trustee to each trust, get insurance for the board and trustees and, most importantly, consult their lawyers.

Toward Outsourcing
The concerns about the expense of the family office were unfounded. It was serving a number of important functions, including monitoring investments and creating economies of scale for the family so they could access otherwise unavailable investments and advisors. While most of the personnel were necessary to this effort, we did recommend that the work of two in-house accountants be outsourced. We advised the family to at least outsource tax return review and planning to a tax CPA who could provide fresh ideas, avoid penalties and communicate regulatory changes.

A makeover, like any in-depth analysis, often prods the client into making tough decisions. At other times our advice just reinforces what a client suspected all along. We recently conducted an assessment for another smaller family office with a manager who was a lawyer. The manager had been handling back-office functions, preparing tax returns and overseeing investments. He was, besides being overextended, not the best-qualified investment advisor out there; the family’s portfolios were not performing as well as they should have been. We found that this family office would be much better off outsourcing most of the functions. They took our suggestion and set up a virtual family office, with just one part-time employee to manage bill payment, social calendars and other lifestyle concerns. Instead of mediocre results, the family is now served by best-in-class investment, tax and legal professionals.

Most family offices do not start with a business plan. Family members simply get involved with various ventures and the institution evolves. I have often seen family offices that seem like a voluminous extension of the founding family member’s desk at home—full of unorganized paper. For that reason, I tell clients to refer to their family office with a corporate code name; you don’t have to make it official, but try calling it something like the Jones Family Enterprise when you talk about it with family members and employees. It is amazing how this helps you see the family office as the business organization that it is.

1 | 2 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Inside Jobs
» Office Protocol
» Ties That Bind
» Finding the Perfect Fit
» Defying Convention
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference