For some, the arrival of spring heralds new beginnings after a long winter. For the editorial staff of
Worth,
it signals the return of a daunting, yearly task: the selection of the Top 100
Wealth Advisors from a large pool of highly qualified applicants. The complex
process of gathering, organizing and assessing the information that wealth
advisors submit takes months to complete, and sometimes pushes hard against
deadlines set for the publication of the October issue, in which the final list
is published.
While this task is never easy, it was particularly difficult
this year. The hundreds of advisors who answered our Top 100 questionnaire
offered keen insights into the current investment climate. A number of the
responses we received were exceptionally thorough and original, evidencing the
kind of comprehensive financial expertise and client focus that elevates
advisors to the pinnacle of their profession. Some who made the list in the past
are noticeably absent this year; others who have never participated before make
their debut.
In anticipation of the inevitable questions about how we choose
the individuals we honor, please know that our methodology is straightforward.
While our weighing of the various criteria may change in response to market
shifts or economic activity, the methodology we use to gather, organize and
analyze the information remains constant.
The process begins with an invitation to our readers to
nominate those wealth advisors who have truly gone above and beyond the call of
duty in meeting their clients’ needs. We also solicit nominations from private
banks, wealth management and investment firms and industry associations.
Nominated advisors, and others who wish to participate, then complete a detailed
online questionnaire in which they provide their educational and professional
credentials, work history, compensation structure, client retention rate and
other background information. We then ask about areas of expertise, their
approaches to working with new clients and how they meet the unique needs of the
affluent clientele they serve.
While we give this information considerable weight in our
selection process, we place the greatest importance upon each candidate’s
ability to intelligently discuss the current investment climate, the markets and
their strategies for success. At this point, the competition becomes fierce.
Affluent investors pay their wealth advisors to be independent thinkers, and
based on the spectrum of analyses we read, many earn their keep. This year, very
few agreed on the best way to invest in a global market where phenomenal
growth—and risk—can be found offshore, and dramatic market swings have become
daily events. Even fewer claimed that their strategies were foolproof. Many,
however, explained their insights clearly, concisely and with conviction—exactly
how they should communicate with their clients.
Following our compilation of a preliminary list, the final step
in the selection process is one of verification. Worth’s editorial staff confirms, to
the extent possible, that the information advisors provide is accurate and
truthful. We run background checks and occasionally ask additional questions of
both advisors and their clients. By the time this step is completed, spring is
just a memory and the dog days of summer are upon us. With deadlines
approaching, we finalize our list, confident in the choices we’ve made.
The competition this year was extremely tough. But that’s how it should be.
Wealth management is not an easy profession—the men and women who guide their
clients through life’s triumphs and challenges must be smart, resilient,
decisive and dedicated. Those honored in the following pages embody all these
qualities and more. We salute them. They are Worth’s Top 100 Wealth Advisors for
2007. Back to Main Article: Taking the Measure of Your Managers
|