Origins and Competencies MFO firms originate from various sources: single-family offices
that have invited nonrelated families into their fold; independent financial
advisory firms that expand their offerings; large financial institutions that
establish family office services; and, increasingly, from merged organizations
(the most common being an independent firm purchased by a banking or trust
institution, that keeps the independent’s name). The Alliance has found
best-in-class firms that arose from each of these origins. However, families
must also weigh other factors, including specialization, independence and
management continuity.MFO SERVICE OFFERINGS | | 1. Comprehensive financial planning | | 2. Portfolio management | | 3. Back office/consolidated reporting | | 4. Estate and wealth transfer | | 5. Tax planning, preparation and compliance | | 6. Risk management | | 7. Trustee services | | 8. Life management | | 9. Family consulting, governance, meetings and
education | | 10. Strategic philanthropy and administration | For example, accounting-based independent MFOs are often strong
in tax and compliance work, and tend to work with first-generation wealth
creators (e.g., the business owner who sells out). However, because these MFO
firms are independent, they may not have business continuity plans in place. On
the other hand, large financial institutions can be counted upon not to go away
entirely, but they are often subject to mergers and other restructurings. These
institutions generally have higher employee turnover, and they may push their
own products, which in turn can affect the objectivity of their advice. And just
because an MFO comes from a single-family office, for instance, there is no
guarantee of success in delivering services on a consistent basis to the private
families it invites in. Families must ask the right questions to ascertain
whether these issues affect the MFOs they consider hiring. What professional credentials, competencies and experience does
the MFO firm need to possess in order to implement and manage the 10 core
services that are essential to the private families they serve? Each firm will
have a personality, in that along with its point of origin, it will emphasize
and specialize in certain core services offered and the types of families served
(such as first-generation wealth creators versus multigenerational families).
According to the Alliance’s Multifamily Office Standards, best-in-class MFOs
will have a multidisciplinary staff (e.g., CPA, CFP, CFA, JD or other
professional credentials) that demonstrates professional competency and the
experience to serve complex client families. They will have at least three
years’ experience in providing services to a minimum of 10 unrelated families
with a minimum median net worth of $20 million. They should also demonstrate
their professional involvement and commitment by assisting in setting standards
and self-regulation; participation in family office conferences, seminars and
meetings; and membership in leading organizations. Finally, these firms should
be stable in terms of their ownership, management and business continuity to
ensure their long-term viability and ability to serve succeeding generations of
their client families. The Alliance estimates that there are now more than 100 MFOs in
North America, but it recognizes few more than 20 that are truly best-in-class.
The typical best-in-class firm is independently owned and operated with a staff
of 30 professionals. It serves about 40 families with a median net worth of
approximately $50 million, for a total net worth under advisement of about $2
billion, roughly four times the size of the average single-family office. While
growing as a whole, these MFOs struggle with managing their growth and with
finding the key to consistent, replicable delivery of services to their clients.
They also have a difficult time finding and retaining key talent to serve their
growing list of families. And, because they are largely independent, they have
issues surrounding the business continuity of their firms. How the firms manage these issues sets the leaders apart. The best-in-class
MFO firms are well managed and are most concerned about giving their clients
objective advice. They are not as concerned about growing their client list.
Indeed, they consider the best-fit nature of a long-term relationship with any
new family referred to them. As a result, the best-in-class MFO firms back away
from as many potential client families as they accept. Because of this, these
firms appear "shy" and unsophisticated in their marketing efforts. When matched
with the privacy concerns and inaccessibility of wealthy families, one begins to
understand why it is so difficult to find a best-in-class MFO suited to that
prototypical middle-market woman and her complex needs.
|