subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Advisors /
Feature
Hedging Against Disaster
Elizabeth Harris
11/01/2006

The scandals of the past few years have also made it good practice for investigators to interview a fund’s principals. On occasion, they present their findings to the managers and ask for their response. Their reactions can often say more about their character than details in the dossier. “You’re trying to gauge their reaction, and that is more important than what they’re saying,” Shain says. “How honest are they? Do you have to be Johnnie Cochran to get the answer, or will they just tell you?”

Do-it-Yourself Diligence
Some investors are conducting their own version of due diligence, but unless they have some experience in this field, their results may fall short, and can even provide a false sense of security. “For most people out there, it would be a daunting task,” says Ed Bowman, a partner with Newtown Square, Pa.-based Veritable, a multifamily office overseeing $8 billion in investments. “We have the advantage of 15 years of interviewing these managers.” Firms that offer
access to hedge funds and funds of funds can pressure funds for more information than would be available to all but the largest individual investors.

Even so, Bowman likens the do-it-yourself due diligence he conducts to the type of steps investors should take when acquiring a small, privately owned company; the capital commitments and lack of transparency are often similar in both types of transaction because of the funds’ substantive investment minimums and often lengthy lock-up periods. “Simple things like verifying with a university if the individual claims to have a degree—these things are not hard to do,” he says. Bowman also follows the same procedure that a professional investigator would take when creating a background profile. “We talk to people we know in the industry to create a complete picture,” he says. “Maybe they went to school with the person, or maybe they worked for the person in the past.”

Whether or not an investor decides to hire an investigator or go it alone, a number of issues should be top of mind. If a fund outperforms on an unusually consistent basis, this may be a warning sign, Bowman says. When choosing a hedge fund, financial advisors often use quantitative screens to bring strong performers to light, but these tools may also highlight funds with overly consistent records—such as those that have been manipulated.

Another important aspect to investigate is the prospective fund’s logistical professionalism. Hotshot traders decamping from investment banks to set up funds may know how to run a front office (the trading floor) but be clueless about middle-office operations (where risk and information management activities take place) and what goes on in the back office (where trades are valued and accounted for), all of which are crucial to a fund’s success. Small funds often outsource some of these activities to third parties; these entities should be recognized industry leaders.

Funds that manage their own back-office operations should put them under the watch of experienced chief financial officers or chief operating officers, according to a report by David Aldrich, a managing director with the Bank of New York. Aldrich outlined a series of additional recommendations in Hedge Fund Operational Risk: Meeting the Demand for Higher Transparency and Best Practice, a paper published for the firm’s clients in June. If a hedge fund outsources these duties to a third party, investors should make certain that an operational staff member oversees that work. Aldrich also recommends that investors review funds’ rules governing trading and how trading errors are managed. Funds should also have a process for valuing assets, especially illiquid ones, that are independent from their trading floor. Chris Dardaman, a partner with Brightworth, a wealth management firm in Norcross, Ga., also recommends scrutinizing a fund’s use of leverage and the competence of its auditors and legal counsel.

While no amount of research can completely immunize investors from the risk of losses due to a clever manager’s determination to defraud, it can help weed out those firms poised to collapse from simple incompetence—or indolence. “Go with your gut; go visit them on-site,” Turecek says. “There are horror stories in which people have gone to a fund manager’s office, and there was no activity there at all.”  

Elizabeth Harris is a staff writer for Worth.
Illustrations by C.J. Burton.

Additional Information 
The Bad and the Ugly

A Starting Point
Web resources for DIY DUE diligence.

LexisNexis mines news and legal cases for information on
individuals and companies. lexisnexis.com

Pretrieve is a searchable archive of public financial and court records pretrieve.com

The National Association of Securities Dealers
provides background data on registered brokers, including employment and disciplinary histories. nasd.com/brokercheck, 800.289.9999

The Federal Judiciary’s Public Access to Court Electronic Records— PACER—system provides information on fund managers’ legal histories. pacer.psc.uscourts.gov, 800.676.6856

1 | 2 | 3 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Pruning the Thicket
» Whistling Down the Street of Tears
» Storming the Citadel
» Skirting Swindlers
» Hedged Expectations
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference