 |
Five affluent investors with different financial circumstances and goals all recognized they needed
more from their advisors. All leveraged personal and professional contacts for
recommendations and thoroughly researched the credentials and qualifications of
prospective candidates. Armed with knowledge and persistence, they successfully
navigated the financial jungle and now enjoy more beneficial working
relationships with their financial advisors and, consequently, more peace of
mind.
 Entrepreneurs, former owners of
Kiehl’s.
Need: A global reach for their business and investment
activities.
Strategy: Allow leading banks to compete for their business;
perform thorough research on leading contenders.
Klaus and Jami Heidegger were going global. In 2000, they sold Kiehl’s, a
155-year-old hair and skin-care products business purchased by Jami’s
grandfather in 1921, to L’Oreal for a reported $175 million. They set off to
start new businesses, leveraging their branding and marketing skills. But they
soon realized they needed access to a financial advisory team at a global
investment bank that had a broader footprint than that of their then-current
brokerage firm. “We do business in Switzerland, and I go to Asia a lot where we
have manufacturing operations; UBS has a presence and will be able to offer us
support in all those regions,” says Klaus, who is president of Swiss Masai,
which manufactures specialized ergonomic footwear.
Yet, the decision to go
with UBS came only after researching and weighing their options, a strategy they
admit they did not follow when picking their preceding firm. The Heideggers
chose their previous advisor—a broker at a large Wall Street house—after
relatively little comparison shopping. A personal friend worked at the firm, and
they assumed it would be advantageous to know an individual in an oversight
position. They now regret it. “Our performance was not what it could have or
should have been,” Jami recalls. “We learned we really should have shopped
around more and gotten competitive bids for the services that were being
provided.”
This time, they did shop around. Their short list included five
advisors, gleaned from a combination of references and their own due diligence.
They wanted to ensure smooth communication with their account management team
and that their advisors would be responsive to and accepting of their rather
conservative risk tolerance. They also wanted good internal governance and
oversight. They undertook several meetings with three advisors—all global
financial powerhouses that could support their financial activities in Asia and
Switzerland—and reviewed reams of supporting documents in a process that took
nearly five months.
“We learned we were desirable clients and that we could
shop around and have everyone fight over us,” says Jami. The couple opted for
UBS because it offered what seemed to them the perfect combination of
attributes: Backed by a bank, they were comfortable that their new advisors
would have to meet more rigorous regulatory guidelines than those at their
former brokerage. They also felt their new advisors clearly understand how
conservative they are (“We keep almost all our money in muni bond accounts;
almost nothing in stocks,” Klaus says. “Our goal is wealth preservation,” Jami
adds.) Having specific qualifications or credentials was less important than
being reassured that their advisor was not going to try to pressure them into
transactions or products that they did not want. “We researched the structure
and [found] that there was no sign of conflict of interest between the
investment bank and the investment advisory parts of the business,” Jami says.
They were drawn to the fact that UBS’s high-net-worth investment business
operates independent of any other UBS division, particularly those involved in
marketing funds or other investment products.
The Heideggers admit that while
switching brokers is a hassle that cost them and their personal attorney nearly
five months of work, the change has been for the better so far. “Now we know
that you have to ask all the questions to make sure you know your advisor and
that you can trust him to do what it is that you want,” Klaus says.
Former chairman and CEO of Shell Oil Co.
Need: A wealth advisor to manage an increasingly complex portfolio from a
geographic distance.
Strategy: Seek out an upstart firm where his account
would be considered very large and important. Rather than relying on credentials
or an impressive client list, Miller looked for eager professionals who could
devote a significant part of their time to his affairs.
It has been more than a decade since Steve Miller moved his growing
investment account to Houston, Texas-based financial planners Deborah Stavis and
Mary Margolis, now co-owners of Stavis, Margolis Advisory Services.
Periodically, he will get pitches from advisory teams working at the private
banking divisions of Wall Street’s biggest firms. “I’ll look seriously at what
they offer, and I would consider switching again if I saw a reason to, but I
don’t,” Miller says. “It’s not the name of the firm, but who is working on your
account that matters, and if they aren’t good, it doesn’t matter how good the
firm is.”
In 1992, when Miller shifted his investment accounts from two large
national brokerage firms to Stavis, Margolis, it was on the eve of his family’s
departure for what became a seven-year series of progressively senior management
appointments overseas. “It was clear that I needed someone who was going to
really care about how my portfolio was going to be managed, who could stand in
for us while we were overseas,” he says. That was even more important in the
days before email and the Internet, because Miller’s job involved spending as
much as two-thirds of the year on the road. “I simply would never have had the
time to handle personal financial matters.”
Looking back, Miller chuckles
when he recalls that he went on gut feelings when he hired Stavis and Margolis.
“They had no track record, or very little track record, at that point—it’s a
hell of a way to choose your financial advisor. But because they were starting
out, they were able to give clients the kind of individual attention I realized
I couldn’t get from the brokerages,” he says. “If I had relied heavily on formal
credentials, I might never have hired them.” His gamble paid off: Within a few
years, Miller had become a managing director of the Royal Dutch Shell Group, and
he called on Stavis and Margolis to address a range of complex financial issues
that resulted from his promotion. “Income was flowing in from multiple
countries, and the benefit plans were different. Suddenly both my asset and my
tax situation became even more complicated than that of an ordinary expat,”
Miller says. On one occasion, he recalls, his two advisors sat down in a room
with 16 different Shell tax advisors from various jurisdictions to thrash out a
complex tax issue.
| “It’s not the name of the firm, but who is working on your account that
matters. And if they aren’t good, it doesn’t matter how good the firm
is.”–Steve Miller | In his search for new financial planners, Miller looked
specifically for experts who had the skills necessary to manage his portfolio
and his range of financial issues as those grew. Stavis and Margolis proved
their mettle by developing a plan that included a variety of assets and
retirement benefits. But they won the job by being able to show Miller that they
could devote enough attention to his needs to serve as his de facto personal
CFOs. Three years ago, Miller retired from Shell, and now serves on the board of
Reliant Energy, as well as several nonprofit boards. He also chairs the board of
trustees at the University of Illinois. Now that his portfolio is far larger and
he is being actively wooed as a potential elite client by other private banks,
Miller says there is no reason for him to switch again. “Their performance is
superior and so is the sense that I have that they have my interests at heart.”
Indeed, he has entrusted the firm with the management of assets in a foundation
he and his wife have established.
Retired commodities firm executive.
Need: A highly skilled wealth advisor who could work on a more personal level
with his entire family.
Strategy: Numerous in-depth interviews to determine
compatibility with his stated goals. Using references from friends and
associates, Strongin held repeated discussions with short-list candidates about
needs and objectives. Through interviews, he was able to find a team of
financial experts who could work on a much more personal level and act as family
advisors.
“I didn’t realize that it was possible to have someone be a family advisor and
not just an investment advisor.” –Phil Strongin | When Phil Strongin retired from his senior executive post early in 2005, he
realized that his current financial advisor, a broker in the asset management
division of a retail bank, was not going to be up to the task of managing all
the money that would soon arrive in his account. “A number of my investments
were cashing out, and I had to make some fast decisions about how to invest that
capital,” he says.
His former advisor had not been doing anything wrong.
Rather, Strongin’s needs were growing and changing, and he wanted an advisor
with whom he could have a closer working relationship. “I needed to feel that I
was an individual and not just an account number or statistic,” he recalls.
“That was the most important thing when I started looking for a new
advisor.”
Strongin began his search by asking for suggestions from his
friends. He then pared their recommendations to a short list of four or five
firms, which he examined and interviewed. “Without question, the strongest
positive recommendation that I got was about the Moneta folks,” Strongin says.
“Then I interviewed them over the phone, sat down with them and received a
presentation about how they would deal with my account, and looked for
reassurance that they were going to invest wisely.”
Strongin says that on
paper there probably was not much difference between the qualifications of his
old and new advisors. Both, for instance, have the certified financial planner
credential. But at Moneta Group, Strongin would have access not just to an
individual advisor, but to the team of specialists working with that advisor,
both inside and outside the firm. (Moneta claims to have 130 employees who
collectively hold about 100 professional designations.) An in-house attorney
counsels clients at no extra cost to the client, and other experts offer advice
on taxes, estate planning, insurance and real estate. Former Moneta principals
have established a handful of affiliated firms, including tax preparation and
retirement planning. “I can call and get advice on pretty much any strange
question I have,” Strongin says. This has included advice on how his daughter
should handle switching her health insurance when she changed
jobs.
Personality issues were also vitally important to Strongin, who says he
did not want to mediate between his attorney or his accountant and his financial
advisors. “It turns out they work with a wide network of other professionals on
their clients’ behalf, who spoke highly of Moneta,” he says. Even better, they
came to his house (“My prior advisor had never done that.”) and spent an entire
afternoon and evening reviewing their suggested changes to his portfolio. They
introduced him to a number of new stock funds that had impressive long-term
track records, such as the Third Avenue Value Fund and the Earnest Partners
small cap value fund. “They just had a more sophisticated and comprehensive
grasp of the world, and that was something I valued,” Strongin says.
Most of
all, Strongin says that he is discovering that it is possible to have a team of
advisors that serves his entire family and all their needs. In the past, Moneta
has helped parents teach children to manage their money and assisted clients in
caring for aging parents, going as far as finding in-home help. “I didn’t
realize that it was possible to have someone be a family advisor and not just an
investment advisor,” he says.
Pharmaceutical industry executive and entrepreneur.
Need: An advisor with the expertise to integrate and manage a complex
portfolio and concentrated stock holdings.
Strategy: Seek recommendations
from professionals in the financial services industry and from other investors
with similarly complex wealth advisory needs.
A microbiologist and biochemist, Allan Avery launched a Connecticut medical
communications business that was acquired by a bigger conglomerate in 1997. His
reward: more than $10 million in stock in the acquiring company. “My accountant
told me I needed help to deal with all this money in one single stock—I learned
the phrase ‘concentrated stock’ around that time,” says Avery, laughing. Until
then, he had dealt with a range of financial service providers—one at a large
regional bank, another at a brokerage firm. But he realized that while those
advisors were helpful in managing a small portfolio of stocks or constructing a
bond ladder, they did not seem to have the expertise that would be required to
effectively manage Avery’s stock windfall. Another problem: “I had spread my
financial affairs around so much among different advisors that none of my
strategies were integrated,” confesses Avery. “I guess that’s easy to do when
you have means, but you don’t yet have real wealth.”
He started asking
friends and professional contacts to recommend a financial advisor who could
pull all these disparate strands together and make recommendations on what he
should do with his large block of stock in a single company. The latter task was
of overwhelming importance—he knew that he could not just sell it outright; it
needed to be hedged in a way that took into account tax rules and securities
laws. Few of the brokers he was working with had the expertise to do this. Then
his accountant introduced him to Tom Phillips and Bill Donnell at Merrill Lynch,
two advisors who work with a team of brokers and bankers to serve wealthy
clients. Donnell oversees the selection process of managers, tapping into a
broader Merrill Lynch database while using his own knowledge of his clients’
goals and analytical skills to make the final selections. He also handles lines
of credit and provides solutions to deferred compensation, stock options and
pension issues. Phillips specializes in debt investing and handles investment
banking needs, as required, for the group’s clients. A third member, Marc
Berkowitz, directs mutual fund research. “I interviewed them for several hours;
I asked for references,” Avery says. “I wanted to know that their team was
astute at hiring the right managers, that their track record was good and that
they would really work with me to match my asset allocation strategy to what I
thought my future needs would be.”
Avery says he hates the phrase
“one-stop-shopping,” but admits that the breadth of services available, along
with the company’s demonstrable expertise in the area of concentrated stock
positions, were the factors that convinced him to hire the Merrill team. “I can
call one client service person, tell him what I want, and 48 hours later, it has
been done, and I have a range of solutions presented to me,” he says. Only
later, he says, does he realize that eight or more people were involved in
developing those solutions in a timely manner.
Today, Avery says he has
stuck with the Northeast-based team even though his work has taken him to Texas.
“They understand not just my business, but my life and my lifestyle,” he says.
“I’m realizing how important that is, as well as the ability to manage the
money.”
Suzanne McGee is a freelance journalist who writes about financial
issues.
Illustrations by Jonathan Barkat.
Back to Main Article: Navigating the Advisory Jungle
|