subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Thought Leaders / Profiles /
Visions & Revisions
Mutual Antipathy
Debra Ryono
07/01/2004


The frauds plaguing the mutual fund industry were not foreseeable.
The frauds were not only foreseeable, but they were, in significant respects, widely known. Articles about arbitrageurs exploiting stale fund prices had been published for years, including two that I wrote that were cited by New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer in his complaint against Canary Capital [a New Jersey-based hedge fund], yet the SEC never took any steps to address this widespread and well-known problem. The SEC chairman has admitted that the SEC was not even inspecting for late trading or market timing. It is eminently foreseeable that when regulators ignore potential abuses, those abuses will occur.

Now that the trading abuses have been identified, regulators can eliminate them.
As noted above, many of the trading abuses were common knowledge before Eliot Spitzer filed his first complaint, yet the SEC had not taken adequate steps to address them. Thus, there unfortunately is no historical basis for assuming that the SEC will ensure that these and other abuses are eliminated, although the SEC has vigorously prosecuted a number of wrongdoers in connection with the current scandal. For example, the SEC continues to ignore sales abuses that exist, in part, because of the lax SEC standards under which brokers operate. Legislation and constant vigilance by investors, state regulators and Congress are necessary to ensure that the SEC fulfills its responsibilities to the investing public.

The SEC comes down hard on violators.
Sometimes the SEC comes down hard on violators, but sometimes it is inexplicably soft on them. For example, when the SEC settled with the independent directors of the Heartland Funds [the Milwaukee-based mutual fund company], the SEC let them off with only a cease and desist order, the lowest possible form of penalty, and even permitted them to retain directors’ fees earned while the case was pending. These directors oversaw the worse case of mispricing in the history of the industry, in which some investors lost 70 percent of their retirement funds in one day. This pattern has continued through the current fund scandal, where not one independent fund director has been charged with any wrongdoing by any regulator—state or federal.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Fund Follies
» Frank Assessments
» Pruning the Thicket
» Hybrid Hopes
» Whistling Down the Street of Tears
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference