 |
In the spring of 2003, Coca-Cola and Pepsi bottling plants in India had their
licenses revoked by local authorities over allegations that they were depleting
groundwater stores and causing shortages. The companies lost tens of millions of
dollars, plus substantial goodwill in Indian beverage markets. In 2004,
authorities in Beijing announced restrictions on new water-intensive businesses
to avoid severe water shortages. Their plan places limits on the siting of
textile, leather, metal smelting and chemical industries and sets water
conservation rules for makers of beverages, plastics and pharmaceuticals. In
July 2004, government officials in Bangalore, India, announced that the city was
losing information technology firms because of concerns over water scarcity and
reliability. One month later, the government of Victoria, Australia, considered
plant closures to help eliminate the discharge of untreated industrial
wastewater from pulp and paper industries.
Climate change will only further complicate water scarcity, posing
formidable challenges to water systems in the future. |
Global companies that assume
incidents like these are rare may soon find themselves in trouble. All business
sectors—even individual industrial facilities—need to assess the specific
water-related risks they face. Reliable access to clean water has emerged as a
critical issue affecting the environment, human development and, increasingly,
commerce around the world. With a few exceptions, corporations (and their
investors) are unfamiliar with freshwater-related risks and are unprepared to
respond to crises or take actions to head them off.
The most fundamental
water challenge arises from simple scarcity. Already limited supplies of
freshwater around the world are under mounting pressure from growing populations
and the increasing needs of agricultural and industrial users. Growing demand is
increasing competition for a fixed resource, fostering greater levels of public
concern and participation in local control and management. Ultimately,
organizations that fail to think strategically about water may find themselves
embroiled in highly public and emotionally charged disputes over a resource
considered by many to be a basic human right. Climate change will only
further complicate water scarcity, posing formidable challenges to water systems
in the future. Global warming threatens to disrupt traditional rainfall and
runoff and to increase the frequency and severity of both drought and floods.
The changing climate may also degrade water quality by changing water
temperatures, flows, runoff rates and timing, causing significant potential
problems for water users. Power plants in the United States have already been
forced to cut operations to avoid exceeding temperature limits in rivers
affected by drought. In addition, rising sea levels will threaten coastal
aquifers and developments, with costs for businesses in coastal metropolitan
areas.
The Last Drop Although the problems of scarcity have garnered much
attention, declining water quality is an equally vexing issue. As important as
TOP VIEW With clean water supplies under pressure around the globe, many companies may
soon see their supply chains interrupted and find themselves mired in local
disputes. To secure the water they need in this climate of growing scarcity,
global corporations must design and implement multifaceted water strategies. But
first they must recognize the water-related risks they face; to date, few
have. |
water quality is for human and ecosystem health, it is equally crucial to
industries such as high technology, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and food
processing, which rely heavily on it. These businesses are often required to
utilize already costly water treatment systems prior to using it. Even for
companies that do not need the best water, diminishing water quality could lead
to new and expensive mandates to treat or reduce wastewater discharges. While
most industrialized countries have managed to curtail concentrated point-source
pollution emitted from factories and sewage treatment plants, an estimated 90
percent of wastewater in developing countries is still discharged directly to
rivers and streams without any waste processing or treatment. This is changing
rapidly, and companies operating in those countries will likely have to absorb
quickly rising costs associated with meeting new water treatment
requirements.
The full extent of water-related risks to a global company may
be determined largely by factors outside the company’s on-site operations.
Sectors as diverse as apparel, forest products and agriculture require
significant amounts of water to fuel important production inputs. For example,
growing the sugar that goes into beverages or the cotton that goes into clothing
may require more than 1,000 times more water than used in on-site production of
the end product. But today’s traditional industrial water-use estimates fail to
address water risks throughout the supply and production cycles. Businesses
operating in developing countries face a broader set of perils than those in
developed nations. In many of these locales, governments have simply failed to
meet basic human needs for clean water and sanitation services and to mitigate
widespread water-related diseases. Even worse, they often lack the knowledge,
institutional capacity and capital necessary to deal with these problems. Where
the public sector is unable or unwilling to provide basic access to water for
all citizens, businesses are increasingly finding themselves competing for basic
resources in regions where people lack access to them. With as many as 5 million
people dying every year from water-related diseases, this raises the question:
What are corporate responsibilities in such circumstances?
A small but
growing number of companies worldwide are taking steps to strategically address
water risks in ways that protect long-term value. Most companies, however, are
ignorant of these issues and address them in an ad hoc fashion. Although
companies’ water risks vary depending on business sector and areas of
operations, many businesses would benefit from a strategic assessment of their
current water-related risks and a plan to mitigate them. This is particularly
true for companies dependent on reliable supplies of high-quality water or on
large volumes of water, companies with vital operations in areas with scarcity
problems, and companies that rely on inputs that are themselves highly water
dependent.
Water scarcity already poses serious challenges to many companies
and will dramatically affect many more if current trends continue. The good news
is that businesses have a wide range of tools, technologies and techniques to
reduce water use and improve efficiency. There are many examples of businesses
that have been able to save money and improve reliability while reducing water
use—even in water-intensive sectors. Taking water-related risks seriously is the
first step. Fluid Tactics
By implementing a comprehensive water strategy, global businesses can address
risks in ways that protect long-term value. An effective water-risk management
approach includes the following components: Establish a corporate water
policy and factor water risks into relevant business decisions. Top management,
particularly in water-intensive industries, should clearly articulate the
organization’s policies regarding water resource issues. Given water’s growing
importance, companies should consider scarcity and water risks as fundamental
factors when making a range of strategic business decisions, from factory siting
to new product development. Measure water use. Companies must understand
and measure water use and wastewater discharges associated with their current
operations and production, including that of their suppliers. This will provide
a baseline for assessing risks, prioritizing efforts and measuring
progress. Assess local water conditions. Companies, particularly
those with global operations, should assess local water conditions, including
hydrological, social, economic and political factors for all the places in which
they operate. This assessment should flag areas of shortage, rapidly growing
demand and disparities in either access or prices between industrial users and
local communities. Such an analysis can provide advance warning of places where
tensions with the local community may appear in future years or during dry
periods.
Consult with stakeholders. Communities often feel very strongly
about the use of local water resources—and rightly so. Experience has shown that
early identification of local actors and their water-related needs, coupled with
a policy of open and ongoing communication, can reduce the risk of water-related
disputes. In addition, proactive efforts by companies to improve water quality
or water availability can help build positive relations with regional
stakeholders. These efforts can include direct participation in developing local
water systems, provision of funds or appropriate technology, education or water
resource planning. Engage the supply chain. Many companies’ most
significant water impacts and risks may be embedded in their supply chain. To
address this, companies should assess and evaluate water use in their supply
chain and work collaboratively with suppliers to reduce water use and minimize
risks of supply chain disruptions from water-related problems. Implement
the best technologies available. Companies should assess the best-available
technologies for reducing water use and wastewater discharges, commit to using
such technology in new facilities and retrofit existing facilities in areas of
significant water stress. There is a dizzying array of technology that can
reduce water use and improve water quality, including reclaiming and reusing
process water, sophisticated filtration systems and replacing water cooling
towers with air cooling ones. Such technology investments often have very short
payback periods and generate high returns on investment. This is likely to be
increasingly true as water scarcity becomes more severe. Set goals and
targets; measure and report performance. Companies should measure and publicly
report key metrics on their water use and impacts and track how their
performance changes over time. This information can help build confidence among
investors and inform customers, local communities and other key stakeholders
interested in how the company is managing its water risks. Form strategic
partnerships. Many water-related issues can best be addressed on a regional
scale involving multiple sectors and stakeholders. Some companies are working
through organizations like the World Council on Sustainable Development to
promote watershed protection and improve access to water for impoverished
communities. Another example is the regional environmental management system
being developed by Sustainable Silicon Valley in California. This initiative has
identified freshwater as one of the main socioeconomic and environmental
challenges facing the region. In an effort to address this issue, companies in
Silicon Valley are working with other stakeholders on regional water
sustainability policies and practices.
Commit to continuous improvement.
Despite increased efforts by companies and other sectors of society, water
scarcity and water-related business risks are likely to grow in the future. A
commitment to continuous improvement in assessing and managing these risks and
lessening the impacts of a company’s water use on local communities and the
environment can help protect operations (and long-term shareholder value) from
unexpected water-related disruptions. Peter H. Gleick is president and cofounder of the Pacific Institute in
Oakland, Calif. Jason Morrison is director of Pacific Institute’s Economic
Globalization and the Environment program. |