A Surplus of Opinions Poles, in my experience, tend to be forceful and opinionated. It is not by
accident that they set the groundwork for the end of the Soviet Union. If you
talk with three politicians or three economists in a room, you will hear
three—or more—different views. One of the issues they are debating right now is
which model of capitalism to follow: the French and German one with its emphasis
on tight government regulations or the comparatively freewheeling U.S. one.
Actually, the way they have functioned so far bears more of a resemblance to
Italy’s economic pragmatism amidst political upheaval. Poland has had 10
different prime ministers in 15 years, yet the economic policies remain in
place.Poles are also very much aware of a need to lessen their dependence on Germany
as their largest export market, not because of any bilateral bickering, but
because every economic downturn in Germany has a negative effect on Poland. The
political rift between the two countries is two centuries old, and even when the
Poles gets feisty over Germany’s attempts to lecture them about policies, they
are nothing if not pragmatic about their business interests. They know that as
an export-led economy they have to cultivate the market of 200 million people
that EU membership gives them, which they are beginning to do with a particular
emphasis on Scandinavia. Outside of Europe, they are looking at developing more
trade ties with the Middle East. Polish engineering and construction companies
have been there before, and the Middle East seems to harbor goodwill toward
Poland. The Poles have been quick studies in mastering the economic strategies they need
to get ahead since the fall of communism. When I first went there in 1990, with
a $240 million U.S. government grant to invest, they had only a vague idea of
the meaning of such concepts as equity, return on investment and corporate
governance. I once went to a 9 am meeting at a bank where our hosts served
coffee, tea and cognac. (We were special guests, so we rated cognac instead of
vodka.) The drinking culture disappeared for the most part, especially among
executives, within a few years. One of the local partners in our firm had
previously worked as a translator and another was an engineer by training, but
after nearly 15 years of experience in a free market economy, they have become
exceptional investment managers. Back then it was not uncommon for Polish
manufacturers to send their products to Germany or Austria for finishing so that
they could be sold as Western-made brands, figuring that a “Made in Poland”
label would carry the same sort of stigma of inferior quality that “Made in
Japan” did a half-century ago. The Poles are still hesitant to go to market
nose-to-nose with the Western Europeans, but that is changing. Managerial Brass What propels any company forward is smart managers, and Poland has plenty of
these. The whole region has an ambitious young managerial class coming into its
own, but Poland is already into its second generation of managers, who have been
to business school, often in the West, and are very much aware of the need to
measure up to Western standards. I see in them the same kind of energy level and
adaptability that brought technology wealth to places such as Silicon Valley,
Boston and the North Carolina Research Triangle. Now the Polish government and business leaders know that they have to work hard,
and rapidly, to stay ahead within the former Soviet bloc. There is no reason
that they should not see GDP growth of around 5 percent in the next few years—6
percent is probably not sustainable—but the moves they make now will be
something of a barometer for whether EU membership is truly a good idea for
economies that are still in the emerging stage. There are several vital signs to
watch. Poland will be well on its way to being a first-world economy, riding no
one’s coattails, if it succeeds in all of these areas: Establishing recognizable brands and service-industry capabilities is going to
be important. This is particularly so because foreign investment in Central and
Eastern Europe is moving away from privatization and production for local
markets and into export-oriented operations, including business-service
outsourcing. Hungary is ahead of Poland in taking advantage of intellectual
capabilities in the software industry, although Poland will certainly be getting
more into information technology. Poles have something of a reputation for good
engineering and production processes, particularly in semi-tech products. Their
creativity is becoming more apparent in the fashion area, and their proprietary
retail stores have the potential to become better known. It will need to create research and development capabilities and a viable
technology sector, and enforce the laws to protect intellectual property. In the
early 1990s, our firm looked at some software development deals in Poland. While
we believed software manufacturing for the Western markets made sense from a
cost standpoint, it was at a time when the world was in a tech frenzy, and, for
the most part, potential joint venture partners and investors saw no reason to
go all the way to Poland when there were so many opportunities in locales that
already had all of the necessary infrastructure. Today, Poland has enough
science graduates to staff biotechnology and pharmaceutical manufacturing
ventures at around one-tenth the cost in Western Europe. We have seen some
pharmaceutical companies go from making commodity products to licensing and
importing technology from major U.S. concerns. Still, such ventures can go only
so far without stricter enforcement of patent laws. Poland has the D in R&D
but so far has not been able to achieve the R.
|