The global automotive industry is undergoing fundamental change, and
manufacturers in the United States must learn to adapt. New challenges are
changing the business strategies of carmakers, which struggle with excess
capacity, the emergence of China and India as important markets and new tools
such as the Internet and virtual prototyping. As competition reaches a frenetic
pace, they must learn to coordinate operations across the globe and integrate
new technology into their business.In this country, this transformation is important because of the industry’s
far-reaching impact. The average auto-manufacturing job contributes more than
$300,000 of value to our economy, Department of Commerce figures show, including
the sum of labor compensation, profits, rent and interest produced per job. (By
comparison, the average manufacturing job in the United States adds only $73,000
of value to the economy.) Our research shows that the economic multiplier that
we can apply to a job in the auto industry is 10.4. In other words, for every
auto-manufacturing job there are 9.4 jobs generated in related markets, either
in auto supplier firms or in the community. Automakers continue to significantly improve productivity from the plant floor
to the engineering offices. At its most basic level, this translates into fewer
jobs. In fact, we predict that productivity gains could reduce employment by as
much as 15 percent over the next few years. Such a large slip in jobs carries
negative connotations; however, we feel this will occur at a particularly
fortuitous time. By 2013, more than 76 million baby boomers will retire, with
fewer workers available to pick up the slack. In fact, the Bureau of Labor
Statistics forecasts a shortage of 10 million skilled workers in the U.S. by
2010. Carmakers face two immense personnel challenges. First, in the near
future, essentially every auto-manufacturing job will be skills based, requiring
post-secondary education. Second, they must devise plans to retrain existing
employees. Breaking the Cycle Historically, the rise and fall of the auto industry has been characterized by
cycles. High sales years produce high profits and are followed by low volume
years with low profitability. Today, however, high sales volumes are coupled
with low profitability. This is perhaps the most striking evidence that the old
business model is broken and needs to be replaced. Automakers must move away from traditional models that are slow, bureaucratic
and paper-driven. Command and control has been the management style, and product
development has relied on physical prototypes. The new model emphasizes nimbleness. It is anti-bureaucratic; with decision
makers trained to do more listening than talking, and thinking of themselves
more as coaches, rather than monarchs. Manufacturers are investing in digital
technology that enables them to build virtual prototypes rather than expensive
physical ones, and rolling out software that allows workers to immediately
interact and share knowledge around the world. At the corporate level, competing
automakers are learning to cooperate with their rivals. This trend has been
dubbed “co-opetition.” The latest business buzz describes this new model as “lean-agile.” Manufacturers
are learning that they must not only be lean, but also able to shift and adapt
their operations as business requires. Whatever its name, automakers must adopt
it in order to survive. We are already seeing examples of this: Ford and GM are
jointly developing a six-speed automatic transmission; Chrysler, Mitsubishi and
Hyundai are cooperating to produce a common four-cylinder engine; GM has reduced
by nearly two-thirds the cost of major body dies (used in forming fenders, hoods
and other parts) by employing mathematical simulations. Manufacturers are applying this lean-agile approach to every part of their
organizations: from engineering and manufacturing to finance. They are finding
that risk drops for companies with the most productive plants, the lowest-cost
tooling and the most flexible manufacturing systems. By introducing these new
tactics, automakers could potentially change body designs every year, clearly
delineating old and new product lines. We anticipate an exciting future for the automotive industry. “Exciting,” of
course, depends on one’s circumstances. Making a hole-in-one is very exciting
for a golfer, but so is being chased by a mugger. We will see both kinds of
excitement.  | David Cole is chairman and Sean McAlinden is vice president of research
at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich. |
|