 |
Spectators at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa will witness more than a
good sporting contest. The host country itself will be on display. South Africa
is the first nation on that continent to host what many see as the world’s
greatest sporting event. Hosting the World Cup is a powerful endorsement of the
country, which expects the event to give its economy a welcome boost and as many
as 150,000 jobs.
 | | FORMER SOUTH African President Nelson Mandela, center, lifts the World Cup
trophy after it was nnounced that South Africa will host the 2010 World
Cup. (Photograph by Steffan Schmidt/AP Photo.) | For some, winning the right to host the match is the result
of 10 years of conservative government policy and carefully nurtured economic
growth opportunities. It is also a rare chance to launch South Africa onto the
world stage and to showcase its ability to manage an event of such
magnitude.
If the exuberance in the air is to last, however, the government
of President Thabo Mbeki will have to accelerate market-oriented growth. Indeed,
investment is already flowing into the transportation infrastructure and the
property sector as the tourism industry booms. But post-apartheid South Africa,
now only a decade old, still divides into two economies, and making an economy
grow is a more complex problem than hosting a soccer tournament. The challenge
for the government is to create a winning marketplace, which is critical if the
country is to attract the foreign direct investment (FDI) it needs to grow.
FDI has been a sore spot; foreign investors have been slow to reward South
Africa for its sound fiscal policies. Public Enterprises Minister Alec Erwin has
said his goal is to raise FDI to 2 percent of GDP in the coming years, from only
about 0.5 percent of GDP last year. Given both a more stable currency outlook
and favorable economic indicators, the goal is not unrealistic.
The AIDS Crisis Perhaps the country’s most serious long-term economic
challenge is how to deal with a labor force that is literally dying on the
workplace floor from AIDS. About 11 percent of the population is HIV positive,
and the figure in the hardest-hit regions reaches 25 percent. If left unchecked,
AIDS could hollow out the economically active portion of the population, as it
is doing in Zambia, Botswana and Zimbabwe. Early in his presidency, Mbeki
refused to acknowledge the scope of the problem. Recently, he has been more
forthcoming, and the government is now working to roll out antiretroviral drugs
across the country.
| Perhaps the country’s most serious long-term economic challenge
is how to deal with a labor force that is literally dying on the
workplace floor from AIDS. | There are a number of South African initiatives to
address the crisis, many of which benefit from overseas supporters. These
measures are a step in the right direction, but the fight against AIDS will
continue to be handicapped until the government makes it a national priority.
One example to follow in the fight against the epidemic is that of Uganda, which
has seen a decline in HIV infection since 1995, when it launched, in combination
with various other efforts, a prevention initiative known as the ABC plan
(abstinence, being faithful to one partner and condom use).
The second most
precarious situation for foreign investors is the awkward manner in which the
country has begun its land redistribution plan. The Restitution of Land Rights
Act has allowed black South Africans whose families lost their property after
June 19, 1913, when the first race-based laws took effect, to lodge claims for
restitution. The practice is well and good as long as the government carefully
manages it. However, the government has not balanced the redistribution plan
with a similar commitment to the protection of private property rights, the
absence of which is bedeviling so many emerging and former communist economies.
Nor does Mbeki’s administration seem to have fully recognized the risk it is
running in neglecting to send clear signals about its position on this policy to
the foreign investment community.Indeed, foreigners who own property in
South Africa are wary of growing resentment due to rising property prices caused
by their purchase of vacation homes in the country’s most scenic areas. They
fear that, in the event the land restitution program is unsuccessful, they might
become scapegoats and bear the brunt of any retaliation.
Many in industry and
government have realized the issue is crucial. Clem Sunter, a senior director of
the U.K. and South African mining giant Anglo American, says, “South Africa will
have little alternative but to develop a land ownership model…more in
keeping with the industry model.” He suggests, “One way to do this would be to
turn farms into companies, with shares being spread variously among employees,
new black shareholding consortiums and the original farm owners.” Regardless of
what model the government chooses to follow, it is imperative that the process
is just, and that it does not unduly jeopardize the fragile agricultural
economy.
Growing Pains The government is acutely aware that it needs to promote
growth. Trevor Manual, the minister of finance, wants to raise the rate of
investment and halve the unemployment rate. The ministry has not fully addressed
how it intends to accomplish this. It could spend more and tax less. It could
also change the tax policies to encourage growth. For example, a more
expansionary fiscal policy with less dependence on income tax, especially
corporate income tax, would help.
| Foreigners who own property in South Africa are wary of growing resentment due to rising property prices caused by their purchase of vacation
homes in the country’s most scenic areas. | As in many first-world countries, there
will have to be an effort to create more jobs, the majority of which need to be
in the micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprise sectors. The government will
also need to support sustained growth of established small and midsized
enterprises, which have already survived for some time in the market, rather
than squandering resources on funding untested start-ups.
The dire
unemployment situation raises the risk that, in an effort to appease the masses,
Mbeki may be tempted to put a brake on privatizations, because they often lead
to the loss of jobs. Indeed, a number of ministers, along with Mbeki himself,
have indulged in antimarket and antiforeigner rhetoric. While their frustration
with the complexities of governance, tepid economic growth and lack of FDI may
be understandable, these sentiments will repel foreign investors.
South
Africa will be seeking to boost its transportation and power infrastructure. As
a consequence of a poorly managed rail system, South African roads have been
overstressed, and there is a significant need to rebuild and expand them.
Meanwhile, South Africa will reach its power generation capacity in 2007, and
will no longer be able to maintain low power prices. At that point, there will
be a need for substantial investment in generating capacity. It is likely that
the government will look toward private-sector partnerships to finance these
investments.
Housing is another trial for the government. The rapidly
emerging middle class is creating demand for new housing and low-rise office
development. Construction corporations are likely to benefit from a steady
increase in demand through the medium term and into the preparation phase for
the World Cup.Fiscal Fortitude Despite these formidable long-term challenges, there is
good news. Much is going right in South Africa today. Mbeki’s African National
Congress, having secured 69.68 percent of the votes in the 2004 national
election, is stable and may well be the most democratic emerging-market
government today.
Its accomplishments in the past decade are astonishing and
symptomatic of enormous adaptive potential. In what is surely one of the
steepest political learning curves in history, the nation has recovered from the
near financial meltdown of the apartheid era, entrenched a democratic
constitution, reduced inflation to within reach of the officially targeted 3
percent to 6 percent range, and reduced the sovereign risk premium from
approximately 300 basis points in mid-2002 to a less than 100 basis
points.
Following its plunge in late 2001, the rand has recovered from its
sordid reputation as the world’s worst-performing currency, and it has a stable
long-term outlook. Moreover, the economy has grown consistently. Though GDP
growth needs to reach 6 percent to cut a significant swath in unemployment, it
has inexorably climbed from the 2 percent to 3 percent range of the past few
years to a projected 3.5 percent in 2004 and 4 percent in 2005.
South
African companies have recently begun retooling, which bodes well for future
competitiveness, and there has been a surge in private investment spending. Both
are likely indicators of renewed confidence in the political and economic course
of the nation, and will send a positive signal to candidate foreign
investors.
The prospects of several business sectors are improving. The
government has announced that it will invest 1 percent of GDP in the
biotechnology sector to spur its growth. Foreign banks are likely to follow the
example of Standard Chartered’s expansion into South Africa last year, now that
the banking sector has consolidated into four major players that enjoy
relatively high profit margins. Foreign companies are eyeing growth
opportunities in the retail and telecom sectors, both of which are pushing
vigorously into countries to the north, as far as the Sahara, and will need
funding to support this expansion.
The great hope of all investors, however,
is in the tourism industry, which has become the fastest-growing sector,
expanding at more than 4 percent last year. It has overtaken mining as the
country’s largest foreign currency earner. To accommodate surges in tourism from
Europe and Asia, the Durban area has completed the first phase of a new
waterfront development, and South African safaris are becoming a destination of
choice for travelers wishing to enjoy first-class amenities with their African
bush experience.
The market for retirement communities and services is
another growth area. The moderate climate, stunning geography, relatively low
cost of real estate and significantly lower global costs of private medical
services will combine to make South Africa a hugely attractive magnet for
retirees, who are pouring in from Europe already. One “only in Africa” offer
that European visitors in particular seem to be snapping up: Get a hip
replacement and undertake a recuperative safari in a luxury game park—all for
less than you would pay for private surgery at home, including airfare. If this
degree of inventiveness thrives throughout the country, the prospects for its
economic health are strong indeed. James Thompson is an associate director of Wharton Entrepreneurial Programs
at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, where he oversees a
private-sector HIV management initiative. Ian C. MacMillan is the academic
director of the Sol C. Snider Entrepreneurial Research Programs and the Fred
Sullivan professor of management at the Wharton School. |