Dear Editor: In regard to "The Alternative to Aid" (March 2006),
the article about Palestine has two premises: aid is not the answer and modern
finance is the answer.
Handouts are never the answer. In time, handouts make the donor
weary and the recipients resentful and angry that they are dependent on the aid.
If the donor acknowledges the weariness and sees the resentment, most donors
then add restrictions in a doe-eyed way to incentivize the recipient to
independence. That usually causes the recipient to transition abruptly from
resentment to hostility. The author then comments on how this "is providing the
proverbial fish without teaching the recipient how to fish." It has been my
experience in working directly in 35 different countries that aid is more like:
"Give a country a fish, it eats for a day; teach a country how to fish and you
lose your leverage." Aid, even directed major-project aid, is not the answer,
neither is leverage. Education and true independence–mental, economic and
political–is the only answer.
The second premise is that developed financial products such as
investment, mortgages and insurance will also save the day. Nothing could be
further from the truth. In a country where the rule of law is either absent or
suspect and open for bid, investment opportunities, measured by any standard,
are worth zero.
NOMINATIONS SOUGHT FOR WORTH’S BEST ATTORNEYS
2006
Has your personal lawyer
been invaluable to your financial or emotional health? Would you like to give
your counselor the recognition he or she deserves? Worth is
seeking nominations for our list of the best lawyers serving affluent
individuals in their personal and family needs. A feature on our
findings–highlighting the best legal minds in areas ranging from trusts and
estates to matrimonial law and philanthropy–will appear in our December
issue.
Clients who wish to
recommend an attorney for consideration are requested to complete the nomination
form by June 30. Attorneys who wish to be
considered must complete the application form by July 28.
Both forms and instructions can be found at
worth.com. | Thus, the only way to prosper in a region like this is not to
seek order, but rather to design your profit-seeking venture on chaos. The most
successful venture in chaos is crime: taking from those who have because there
are no enforcement rules. Those who are profiting during chaos do not want order
installed; it ruins their business model just as surly as chaos ruins a business
model based upon order. Crops do not grow in the desert because there is no
water. Businesses do not grow in Palestine because there is no order.
Palestinian leaders blame other nations for their failings, when the failings
are from within. Further, they realize that the imposition of order will get
them killed. Order is bad for business and Palestinian leader longevity.
Palestine is not unique, just a more visible and violent
failure. There are many other countries in the same mire. Before Palestine can
grow economically, order and the real rule of law must be established. The cure
is a bitter pill and can only come from the Arab world. Order will never come
from within. Fifty-plus years have shown us that it must be imposed from
without.
L. Burke Files Financial Examinations & Evaluations, Tempe, Ariz.
Charitable Donations
Dear Editor: In the April 2006 issue, Eli Uncyk wrote a letter commenting on
the December 2005 article, "After the Gavel Falls" in which he suggests donating
the necklace would enable the donor to claim a charitable deduction based on the
appraised value. This deduction at fair market value is rarely the case.
IRC Section 170(e)(1)(B) reduces the charitable contribution
deduction by the appreciation in the value of contributed property, even if the
taxpayer’s gain on a sale would be long-term capital gain rather than ordinary
income or short-term capital gain. A gift of appreciated tangible personal
property, if the donee’s use is unrelated to its exempt purposes or functions,
will be limited generally to the donor’s basis (or FMV if lower).
Because assets gifted to a charity auction will not be used for
the charity’s exempt purpose, the donor’s charitable contribution is limited to
the lower of fair market value or basis.
In addition, a further hurdle applies if the charity is a
private foundation. A contribution of appreciated property (other than publicly
traded stock) to a private foundation is limited to the lower of fair market
value or basis.
Richard Pon Lautze & Lautze, San Francisco Worth welcomes your
comments. Please direct your letters to letters@worth.com.
|