![]() |
||
| Letters to the Editor | ||
| Profiting From Chaos
07/01/2006 |
||
Dear Editor: In regard to "The Alternative to Aid" (March 2006), the article about Palestine has two premises: aid is not the answer and modern finance is the answer. Handouts are never the answer. In time, handouts make the donor weary and the recipients resentful and angry that they are dependent on the aid. If the donor acknowledges the weariness and sees the resentment, most donors then add restrictions in a doe-eyed way to incentivize the recipient to independence. That usually causes the recipient to transition abruptly from resentment to hostility. The author then comments on how this "is providing the proverbial fish without teaching the recipient how to fish." It has been my experience in working directly in 35 different countries that aid is more like: "Give a country a fish, it eats for a day; teach a country how to fish and you lose your leverage." Aid, even directed major-project aid, is not the answer, neither is leverage. Education and true independence–mental, economic and political–is the only answer. The second premise is that developed financial products such as investment, mortgages and insurance will also save the day. Nothing could be further from the truth. In a country where the rule of law is either absent or suspect and open for bid, investment opportunities, measured by any standard, are worth zero.
Palestine is not unique, just a more visible and violent failure. There are many other countries in the same mire. Before Palestine can grow economically, order and the real rule of law must be established. The cure is a bitter pill and can only come from the Arab world. Order will never come from within. Fifty-plus years have shown us that it must be imposed from without. L. Burke Files Charitable Donations Dear Editor: IRC Section 170(e)(1)(B) reduces the charitable contribution deduction by the appreciation in the value of contributed property, even if the taxpayer’s gain on a sale would be long-term capital gain rather than ordinary income or short-term capital gain. A gift of appreciated tangible personal property, if the donee’s use is unrelated to its exempt purposes or functions, will be limited generally to the donor’s basis (or FMV if lower). Because assets gifted to a charity auction will not be used for the charity’s exempt purpose, the donor’s charitable contribution is limited to the lower of fair market value or basis. In addition, a further hurdle applies if the charity is a private foundation. A contribution of appreciated property (other than publicly traded stock) to a private foundation is limited to the lower of fair market value or basis. Richard Pon Worth welcomes your comments. Please direct your letters to letters@worth.com. |