subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Thought Leaders / Letters / To the Editor /
Letters to the Editor
Cancel the Revolution
06/01/2005

Dear Editor:
Class Conscious” (April 2005) is a fine piece of socialist propaganda. Chuck Collins seems to assume that we are a nation here to serve the government and their omniscient views of the public good. If he had only read to the end of Atlas Shrugged, he would know what giving the government too much power and resources does to a society. As citizens of this country, we should fight to retain our property and do with it as we see fit, not bow down to the whims of politicians and their pork barrel policies.

It seems that Mr. Collins is advocating for the improvement of all citizens’ social status, yet he does not support private foundations seeking this goal. Shouldn’t the Waltons be able to decide how their money is spent to the betterment of our society, or should all private foundations consult Mr. Collins to make sure he feels the cause is worthy? Can someone please tell Mr. Collins that our country was founded on the freedom to choose, not the freedom for government to make choices for its citizens.
Tim Yaeger Palo Alto, Calif.

Dear Editor:
Self-styled class warriors like Chuck Collins are so blinded by their ideology that they miss the point. All the good causes they want to help, all the wrongs they seek to right, would suffer from the type of collectivist governmentled “accountability” he espouses. Why? Because taxation destroys wealth and initiative, and no entrepreneur is going to voluntarily hand over his fortune to a bureaucracy.

He even insults his own great-grandfather by saying he owed his success to government regulation! I’m not sure Oscar Mayer would agree.
Colin T. Brown, CFP TEP The Wealth Advisory Toronto, Ontario

Dear Editor:
In “Class Conscious,” the issue is the creation of wealth and what should happen to that wealth. The author seems primarily concerned with past generational “silver-spoon” heirs. I am concerned about the first generation creators of wealth and their rightful prerogatives. First, an estate has been created after multitudinous taxes have been paid. Should the creator of that wealth not have the right to judge the competency of his heirs to handle it or alternatively select philanthropic channels? The alternative is that the government expropriates his money with an estate tax, to let those in Washington decide how to spend it. These are the same people who have irresponsibly and dishonestly spent Social Security surpluses to mask the federal deficit.

I think the estate tax should be abolished. Let the creator dispense as he wishes. He owns it; he paid the taxes on it. After all, we have experienced a few generations of wealth transfer and seen the results—no apartheid society here!
Robert P. Watson South Norwalk, Conn.

P.S. I think the author belittles his great-grandfather, Oscar Mayer. I suspect his success was due to the quality of his sausages, not government regulations.

Dear Editor:
As a Worth subscriber, I was extremely disappointed to read the headline “The Case for a 100 Percent Estate Tax” on the cover and statements in Chuck Collins’ article, “Class Conscious,” that 1 percent of the population owning 50 percent of the wealth would create an “apartheid” society. This is socialist rubbish. The freedoms Americans enjoy from the Bill of Rights do not depend on the distribution of wealth. My wife and I are not rich, but we don’t think the government is entitled to the lion’s share of anyone’s estate, no matter how rich.

Besides the immorality of a confiscatory estate tax, its detrimental impact on savings and investment should be considered. There was a 1998 study done in the House of Representatives finding that “the estate tax generates costs to taxpayers, the economy and the environment that far exceed any potential benefits that it might arguably produce.” It is available online at www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/estattax/estattax.htm. If billionaires such as Warren Buffett are so worried about the concentration of wealth, they should just voluntarily give their money away.
Vivek Rao Narberth, Pa.

Worth welcomes your comments, critiques and suggestions. Please direct your letters to letters@worth.com
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Class Conscious
» The Estate Tax and Philanthropy
» Best to Stay Put
» Palestinian Conundrum
» Medical Melee
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference