subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Thought Leaders / Letters / To the Editor /
Letters to the Editor
Best to Stay Put
07/01/2005

Dear Editor:
The Perpetual Traveler” (May 2005) by Michael Verdon was a very informative account of legal means to avoid taxes by relinquishing U.S. citizenship and claiming residence in another  country. However, several major disadvantages were omitted to taking up citizenship or claiming legal residence in Canada.

I am a dual U.S.-Canadian citizen who resided in Canada for 25 years. According to the Canadian tax code, while there is no inheritance tax per se, there is a capital gains tax on assets held at death. Assets are not stepped-up as occurs in the U.S. This can be as costly or more costly than an inheritance tax. Secondly, Canada has an exit tax on all appreciated assets that becomes due when changing residency and tax base to another country. These disadvantages ought to make anyone think twice before taking the Canadian option.
John Kershner, Merry Point, Va.

VAT Advantages
Dear Editor:
Michael Verdon, in his article “Taxing Decisions” (April 2005), neglects to mention the greatest advantage of the Value Added Tax. All of our trading partners who rely principally on the VAT exempt their exports from the tax. In addition, according to the WTO rules, they can charge a “border tax” equivalent to their VAT on imports. We can do neither.

Our payroll taxes are imbedded in our products as a cost. They are included in our products when they are exported. There is no way to eliminate them under our current tax system. This alone creates a serious competitive disadvantage in the global marketplace.

With a single tax rate on all categories of products and services, accounting under the VAT would be a simple procedure. The consumer, of course, would have no reporting to do at all.

The regressivity could be addressed by issuing a rebate to everyone, approximating the tax that would be paid by someone at the poverty level. This rebate could be universally issued without a means test. It would be similar to what Alaska did with its oil royalties.
Edward Golden Everett, Wash.

Out of Fashion
Dear Editor:
I just wanted to say how much I appreciated two stories in the April 2005 issue: the editorial “Aristocracy’s Anecdote” and the article “Class Conscious” on the estate tax. They grabbed my eye on the newsstand, and I felt like I got my money’s worth of thought-provoking articles. Thanks for having the courage to broach the out-of-fashion concept that maybe a “self-made man” has a lot to be thankful for and a lot of societal investment behind him (or her).
Elaine Lissner, San Francisco

Worth welcomes your comments, critiques and suggestions. Please direct your letters to letters@worth.com
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Medical Melee
» Grasping the Third Rail
» Palestinian Conundrum
» The Devil You Know
» A Strong Giving Strategy
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference