Dear Editor: I enjoy Worth. The articles are always well
written and smart. However, I was surprised to see Arianna Huffington on the
cover of the December issue. While I was glad to see that the interview was
more about the business of running her blog than her political views, I was
disappointed that you chose such a polarizing figure. Huffington’s blog has
provided a platform for a great deal of partisan hate speech.
I would much rather read about someone who is trying to move
the country forward, instead of an Arianna Huffington or Ann Coulter, both of
whom have an irrational hate of opposing points of view. Matthew Garrott, Avon Lake, Ohio
Dear Editor: The authors miss the entire scope of philanthropic planning for
the client question in November’s Scenario Planning. Can they be reading
Worth, with its frequent articles on this topic? The implementation
of several entrepreneurial philanthropic strategies—e.g., charitable lead and
remainder trusts—could be structured to meet Rachel’s family planning
goals while simultaneously avoiding significant gift, income and estate taxes.
In fact, the right strategies could zero out any and all
transfer taxes. To satisfy the estate tax obligation, philanthropy can be a
much more attractive alternative than the traditional method of paying expensive
(and unnecessary) insurance premiums. I can’t believe that someone of Rachel’s
position would not have three or four favorite charities that she supports from
her annual income and that would do even more using her exceptional asset base
if they were offered the option and the information. Comprehensive planning, at
a minimum, should at least include philanthropic entrepreneurship as a viable
option in the overall process. Tom Bashwiner Vancouver National Historic Reserve Trust, Vancouver,
Wash.
Dear Editor: I just finished reading the article about sibling rivalry
(Advisors’ Forum, November 2007), and, coming from a family with a family
business and watching how people acted both in the generation before me and in
mine, I thought the responses to the question were practical, but not realistic.
In reality, if you are working at a family business you have
been given an opportunity other people don’t have handed to them. Now, I know a
lot of people work very hard in the business, but the fact is that there are
opportunities that are available to them. The writer of the question seemed to
overlook this fact. In addition, I imagine very few parents will pay their
children unevenly based on job titles—possibly experience, but not titles. What
someone needs to tell the person who asked the question is: 1) Make sure you are
receiving the market rate for your job; 2) Stop comparing yourself to anyone
else and just do your job—otherwise, go work in the open market and compare how
fair it is out there. Rachele Field, via email
Dear Editor: I have been subscribing to Worth for some time. I enjoy the topics and articles, and try to absorb and
use the information. However, your monthly "10 Questions for Your Private
Banker" puzzles me. You give us 10 questions to ask and not a clue as to how
they are to be answered—or what the correct answer is.
I would prefer a discussion on each topic and then together we
could have solutions or answers. Please change this item to something of
"worth." M.Y. Wilson, Las Vegas
|