subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Thought Leaders / Letters / To the Editor /
Letters: From Our Readers
Free-Market Dynamics
11/01/2006

Heated Disagreements
Dear Editor:
I attended a weeklong discussion of climate issues, where evidence given by a multitude of well-credentialed experts support Mr. Gore’s claims, so I was surprised to read the letter from James Martin in your September issue (page 22). 

I refer Mr. Martin to Sourcewatch.org (part of the nonprofit Center for Media & Democracy that investigates public relations spin and propaganda) for an illuminating history and description of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, headed by Arthur B. Robinson, “an eccentric scientist who has a long history of controversial entanglements with figures on the fringe of accepted research.” 

The petition Mr. Martin cited dates back to April 1998, and the National Academy of Sciences issued an unusually blunt formal response to it: “The petition does not reflect the conclusions of expert reports of the Academy.” Sourcewatch.org also states that when questioned in 1998, Robinson admitted that only 2,100 signers of the Oregon petition had identified themselves as physicists, geophysicists, climatologists or meteorologists, “and only a few dozen, at most, of the signatories were drawn from the core disciplines of climate science—such as meteorology, oceanography and glaciology—and almost none were climate specialists.”

A recent study (Oreskes—Science, December 3, 2004) of 928 peer-reviewed papers on global warming in scientific journals found evidence of human-induced warming in all 928; zero showed otherwise.
Judith Kolata, Chicago

Realpoli-Critique
Dear Editor:
In “Err America” (August 2006) Julia Sweig begins her piece: “Resentment of the U.S. . . . especially among our allies . . .”  This illuminates her false premise.

With a few exceptions, we do not have, and have not had, allies. What we had are nations that assumed they might some day need us to defend them against the Soviet Union. Lacking that threat, they feel they can afford to be as hostile to us as their national and commercial interests require.

Lord Palmerston, Queen Victoria’s foreign minister, was correct, if undiplomatic, when he noted that nations do not have friends, but merely interests.
Len Winner, Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.

1 | 2 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Educational Entrepreneurs
» Gore Aphobic
» Palestinian Conundrum
» Attentive Innovations
» Asylum of Arts & Science
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference