|
|
 |
 |
| From the Editor: Worthy Notions |
The Benefits of Beneficence
Dwight Cass
02/02/2004
|
Few of these super-philanthropists pursue the "fire-and-forget" model of decades past, writing a check to an established institution and moving on. Rather, their strategies hearken back to those of the Carnegies and Rockefellers who gave not just their money but also their expertise, establishing charitable organizations that operated to their era’s highest standards of business efficiency.
The dedication this requires bears some explanation. As entrepreneurs, we have succeeded by keeping our hands on the levers not only of strategic decision-making, but of tactical implementation as well. The difficult lessons learned from business setbacks caused by delegating responsibility unwisely now inform our charitable activities.
Mistrust is another reason. The decline in confidence in corporate governance and accounting has bled over to the world of philanthropy, where calls for greater transparency have been heightened by outrages like the United Way scandal in 2002. Not-for-profit institutions have been scrambling to bring their accounting and corporate governance policies in line with the for-profit sector’s best practices to preserve the trust of their donors, but suspicion lingers. These institutions are the legacy of earlier generations’ entrepreneurship, but have become lumbered with bureaucracy and vested interests over the years. As the reform of many foundation boards now illustrates, those with inherited wealth are also waking to the need for best practices within their charitable pursuits.
In this month’s issue, we examine how our philanthropic pursuits are inspired by, and in turn influence, our families’ mission statements and our pursuit of meaning. Indeed, in the U.S., a meritocracy without peer, where the first question asked after an introduction is usually "So, what do you do?", philanthropy provides those with substantial inheritances a way to make an important contribution to society.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |