subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Thought Leaders / Culture /
Thought Leaders: Culture
Days of Wine and Closures
George M. Taber
03/01/2008

For nearly four centuries, roughly from 1600 to 2000, there was only one way to seal a wine bottle: with a piece of natural cork from the bark of a type of oak tree grown largely in Portugal and Spain. But in recent years, Australia and New Zealand have turned the wine world upside down by staging a revolt against corks—an uprising that has since spread around the globe.

Winemakers everywhere now have a choice. They can seal their bottles with a natural cork, a plastic cork, a screw cap, a glass stopper or even a cap like those on beer bottles.

Vintners fear that using screw caps on only a few products will send a signal that those wines are inferior.

The rebellion against cork began because so many wine bottles were being spoiled by a chemical known as 2,4,6-trichloroanisole, which makes a wine smell like wet newspaper and taste even worse. Winemakers quietly suffered with the problem for centuries, but finally became fed up in the 1980s, when it became very prevalent.

The stance on corks varies from country to country. In New Zealand, 95 percent of all domestic wines have screw caps. In Australia, more than half of the wines sold domestically have screw caps, but a much lower percentage of bottles exported stateside have them, because the Aussies do not think the U.S. market is ready for cork alternatives. At the other extreme is France, where about 85 percent of wines still have cork closures, while only 5 percent are screw caps and 10 percent have plastic corks. The U.S. offers noncork closures on only 20 percent of the wines it produces.

Winemakers and vineyard owners also are engaged in the ongoing debate over how to close a wine bottle. Convinced that they produce a perfect libation, many winemakers would prefer a screw cap to eliminate the cork taint. Vineyard owners, on the other hand, are not convinced that American consumers are ready for that type of closure on quality wines, and remain faithful to cork.

Instead of a victory for one style or the other, the outcome may be an entirely new technique that would adapt the closure to the wine. Australians have a colorful expression for this approach: horses for courses. Run your horse on a short, fast track if that is where he performs best, or go with a long course if he excels at distance runs. Delicate white wines such as Riesling and Sauvignon Blanc were the first to move in large numbers to screw caps, because those wines are very susceptible to cork taint. On the other hand, the problem is less obvious with a full-bodied red wine. The logical solution would be for wineries to test screw caps first on the white wines, and then continue experimenting with alternative closures for reds. Yet many vintners fear that using screw caps on only a few products will send consumers a signal that those wines are inferior, while the quality wines still receive a cork.

Unfortunately, there is no perfect closure. Natural cork, plastic cork and screw caps—the three biggest players—all have their strengths and their weaknesses. More research is needed to determine which is best, and the final answer is likely to be some variation of different horses for different courses. Closure companies large and small continue to seek a new product that will be better than anything now on the market. The research departments of companies making natural corks, synthetic corks and screw caps are the busiest. Natural-cork producers, which have the most to lose in the $4 billion annual battle for the wine bottle, are investing the most in new production equipment and research.

Peter Gago, the winemaker of Grange, an Australian icon wine that retails for $200 a bottle, excitedly told me about a second-generation glass stopper that he has been testing, which he thinks is superior to the first glass one that was introduced in 2004. France’s Oeneo, meanwhile, insists that its Diam—the first truly industrial natural cork product, which removes taint through a process known as supercritical CO2—is the perfect closure, but the technology has not yet been thoroughly tested in the market. W.L. Gore, the maker of Gore-Tex, has been trying out a natural cork wrapped in one of the company’s synthetic materials. So the best is likely yet to come for consumers in the great wine-closures war, and wineries will have to keep experimenting.

George M. Taber is the author of Judgment of Paris, about the historic 1976 wine tasting when Californian wines defeated French ones, and the new book To Cork or Not To Cork.
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Viniculture Clash
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference