subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Thought Leaders / Culture /
Calculated Response
Animal House
Russ Alan Prince & Hannah Shaw Grove
08/01/2007

All respondents had already taken steps to provide for their pets in the event of their own death (Exhibit 4). About half of all pet owners had completed formal arrangements, such as writing instructions into a will, including nearly 60 percent of the pet-focused crowd. About one-quarter of owners had made informal deals, such as planning with family and friends. A similar number of people say they have both formal and informal provisions to secure long-term care for their pets.

Pet owners are increasingly turning to trust vehicles for their critters (Exhibit 5). Of the 48 percent of respondents who had made formal post-death arrangements, some 19 percent had already established a trust to care for their pet. Not surprisingly, about three times as many pet-focused owners had done so versus animal-focused owners.

Pet owners, however, seemed more concerned with making certain that the caregivers will have ample means to look after their pets. The approximately two-thirds who have formal arrangements attached assets to their pet’s care, with nearly 80 percent of the pet-focused segment and more than half of the animal-focused group doing so (Exhibit 6).

The amount of money pet owners identified was consistent with their level of spending, with an average of $410,000 earmarked for pet care in the event of the owner’s death (Exhibit 7). Pet-focused owners set aside substantially more—some $526,000 on average.

Given the amount of wealth allocated for pet care and the relatively short life span of many domesticated animals, it’s clear that many pets will die before their funds have been used entirely on their care and safekeeping. Pet owners’ directives for excess money best illustrate the biggest differences between our two segments (Exhibit 8). Almost all (98 percent) animal-focused pet owners—those with a broad interest in animal welfare—want money intended for their pet’s care to go to an animal-related charity upon their pet’s death. Conversely, most pet-focused owners choose to have the assets pass to family or friends.

We can’t argue that prosperous pet owners love their animals any more than individuals with less money, but the intensity of their emotions appears exaggerated by the way they use their wealth to care for their animals—and to prepare for their care in the future.

Russ Alan Prince is the president of Prince & Associates, a market research and consulting firm for the affluent, and the author of more than 35 books on related topics. Hannah Shaw Grove, an author and columnist, is an expert on the behavior, concerns and finances of affluent consumers.

1 | 2 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference