|
|
 |
 |
| Features |
Range Rovers
Constance Gustke
05/03/2004
|
Investing in a ranch, like any illiquid asset,
also has a significant opportunity cost. “The buyer may have to give up [other]
investment opportunities that come up,” Kanaly notes. “You have to understand
the cost of [having] assets tied up in the property.”
Arsenic and Old Land Those of us who still feel the lure of the open
range after a sobering talk with our financial advisors may find the challenges
have only just begun. Purchasing a ranch is complicated.
Ranch ownership
rights are far more complex than those attached to most other types of real
estate. Mineral or water rights may be deeded to someone other than the seller,
even if he or she owns the title outright. For example, Funk has third rights to
the water flowing off the mountains onto a ranch he owns in New Mexico,
according to a land grant that goes back to 1868.
To unearth these often
tangled ownership details and other potential liabilities, it is wise to do a
thorough round of due diligence, reviewing the title, performing a phase-one
environmental study, and scrutinizing water rights and fence lines. “There’s no
survey to buy a ranch,” notes Fuller, the Denver-based real estate executive.
“Ranchers have always done business with a handshake.”
There may be hidden
dangers lurking beneath the surface as well. “I’ve seen properties where entire
tractors were buried or even refrigerators,” says Kanaly. Sometimes land that
appears pristine now was once a dump. There may be underground storage tanks
prone to leaking, or old train beds and power lines. “One common thing that
appears on working ranches is having a dipping vat for pesticides with arsenic
in it,” says Bank of America’s Dunbar. “It’s very expensive to remove.” The
environmental assessment is designed to unearth these issues before the
acquisition is closed.
Many ranchers have conservationist leanings and see
the restoration of their newfound properties to a pristine environmental
condition as part of the challenge of developing this particular legacy. Kent
eventually wants to place his land in trust to protect it from developers. “I
want to keep it in the family,” he says.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |