subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Money & Meaning / Philanthropy /
Philanthropy
Foreign Policies
Matthew Schuerman
06/01/2004


The very existence of grassroots groups in countries scarred by poverty and political repression testifies to an inspiring degree of civic spirit. It also means that donors are likely to find indigenous representatives to communicate with instead of parachuting in with solutions to problems locals do not even think exist. Nonetheless, donors may find themselves uncomfortably confronted with a modern version of the “white man’s burden.” Intervention by its very nature will change a culture. It might seem to us a change for the better, but it is important to consider how local inhabitants will experience the trade-offs, whether or not they are aware of them. An isolated tribe may unanimously vote in favor of accepting a satellite radio, but five years in the future, members may have lost their storytelling tradition in favor of listening to soccer scores on the BBC.

Bureaucratic Hurdles
Pragmatically speaking, the loose structure—and loose bookkeeping—of some foreign organizations make it tricky for donors to satisfy U.S. legal philanthropy requirements. In order to claim a tax deduction or, in the case of a foundation, award a legitimate grant, the donor must be ready to prove that the recipient is essentially the equivalent of a nonprofit organization as defined by U.S. law, or that the grant in question went toward a charitable purpose. The Patriot Act and related regulations prohibit giving to groups or individuals that appear on the government’s lists of suspected terrorists. The Treasury Department issued voluntary guidelines for foundations to make sure they do not cross those laws, but several large foundations have criticized the guidelines as onerous and vague. The guidelines should, for example, be of greatest concern for those bestowing grants in regions such as the Middle East or Indonesia, where terrorists have a substantial presence. Yet the Treasury did not make any exceptions for philanthropy in less risky countries.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Foundations in a Funk
» Lost in Translation
» Err America
» Structured Investments Questioned
» Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference