![]() |
||
| First Person: Money & Meaning | ||
| Class Conscious
Chuck Collins 04/01/2005 |
||
We have a mythology about wealth creation in the United States: that it is something an individual does on his own. In fact, all of those on the Forbes 400 list owe their wealth partly to a taxpayer-financed inheritance of public services, such as research and education. Few would have the same experience in a society that lacks the property rights system and public investment structure that we have here. My great-grandfather, Oscar Mayer, came here from Bavaria and was able to apprentice to a butcher in Chicago. The fact that the government enforced health and safety regulations made it possible for people to trust the sausages he sold.
I have a memory, though, of the Detroit riots happening when I was 7. I would look at the pictures in Life; that was my window onto the wider world. I would think, “There is something wrong here that has to do with the gap between those with money and everyone else.” In my 20s, I worked with nonprofits focusing on affordable housing in Worcester, Mass. I once met with 15 working-class families who were trying to buy the apartment building where they lived. They were trying to figure out how to take on second jobs and sell their cars to raise $10,000 in 30 days to make the down payment. I realized I could just write a check and these people would not have to make these sacrifices.
American Apartheid
In late 2000, Bill Gates Sr. called me and said he would like to work with me on the campaign to keep the estate tax. Bill went to college and law school on the G.I. Bill. His son’s success would not have happened without the government grants to the Dartmouth researchers who created computer languages. We have a petition signed by nearly 2,200 multimillionaires and billionaires, calling for reform, but not repeal, of the estate tax. Our position is to raise the exemptions to $2.5 million for an individual and $5 million for a couple. I would advocate a progressive rate structure that would go up to 50 percent or even higher on fortunes over $20 million. Warren Buffet has said he supports a rate of 100 percent on fortunes over $50 million. I could be persuaded to support that, because I think once you reach that level you are wielding tremendous power and influence in a democratic society. Net Profiteers
I am also concerned about the philanthropic sector becoming another arena of private power without any accountability as to where its money goes. The Walton family, for example, is using its foundation to influence the education-reform debate by advocating vouchers. Personally I would rather see the public school system improved, but the point is that the Waltons’ $90 billion fortune will make it possible to create a philanthropic superpower. If we as taxpayers are going to subsidize the creation of foundations, which is essentially what we do, we should make sure they are more accountable to society. Foundations should be required to spend down all of their assets in 30 years. There should also be a requirement that a broad range of stakeholders serve on the board, rather than just family members. I realize these are radical proposals, but there must be a radical shakeup. I would prefer that the very wealthy give more to community foundations. To paraphrase J. Paul Getty, money is like manure—better when spread around. Chuck Collins is cofounder of United for a Fair Economy and of Responsible Wealth (www.responsiblewealth.org). He is also a senior fellow at Class Action, an organization devoted to healing the wounds of America’s class divide (www.classactionnet.org). He is coauthor, with Bill Gates Sr., of Wealth and Our Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated Fortunes, and, with Felice Yeskel, of Economic Apartheid in America: A Primer on Economic Insecurity and Inequality. He is now working on a book about privilege in America, Born on Third Base. |