Your Money Where His Mouth Is On September 15, two weeks after Katrina wreaked havoc on the
Gulf Coast, President Bush addressed the country from Jackson Square in New
Orleans, promising those in the city and in the surrounding region a long-term
commitment. "We will do what it takes, we will stay as long as it takes, to help
citizens rebuild their communities and their lives," he said. | * In 2005 dollars. Source: United States Senate Budget Committee
as of 9/19/05; Insurance Information Institute. (Click image to enlarge) | Despite the president’s promises, Washington viewed initial
requests from Louisiana’s congressional delegation for $250 billion in aid as
far too high, questioning how the money would be used and who would
oversee the spending. In response, Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco created the
Louisiana Recovery Authority to organize the reconstruction efforts. Walter
Isaacson, the former CEO and chairman of CNN who grew up in New Orleans, is vice
chairman of the authority and has become an integral player in bringing focus to
the effort, coordinating recommendations made by a commission set up by New
Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin. The group plans to rally federal aid in three areas:
rebuilding the city’s levees, securing small business administration loan help
and funding education."We lost some of our credibility," Isaacson says of the
original $250 billion request. "That said, we’ve now decided to set our
priorities and say we in Louisiana will do most of this ourselves, and that’s
the way it should be. We’ll rip out our own wallboard and rebuild our own
houses, build up our own businesses–but we have a few things that we need
federal partnership on." TOP VIEW: Some estimate that rebuilding the Gulf Coast damage from Hurricane
Katrina will cost as much as $250 billion. Ultimately, U.S. taxpayers will cover
much of this, a point that leads some to question the government’s rapidly
expanding role as the de facto insurer of last resort against natural disasters.
If the government maintains its willingness to make open-ended commitments for
disaster relief, will it amount to a large scale transfer of wealth, similar to
the New Deal policies of the 1930s? If so, it may have unfortunate consequences
for the economy–and for wealthy taxpayers. | While Congress may question various relief bills in the coming
months, the requests for federal partnerships similar to Isaacson’s will not go
away–in fact, they will only grow in the coming years, on the Gulf Coast and
elsewhere. Already, the more than $40 billion that Newark, Calif.-based Risk
Management Solutions estimates the industry has paid out to cover property
losses in 2005 will make it the most expensive year ever. This does not include
the estimated $12 billion price tag for Hurricane Wilma. Climatologists predict
that rising global temperatures will increase the frequency of category 4 and 5
hurricanes. In earthquake-prone California, development continues unabated.
Cities throughout the West have morphed into sprawling suburbs, pushing into
areas where brush and forest fires that once might have just burned out now
threaten homes and businesses. Private insurers, restricted by increasingly
tough regulations capping what they can charge for insuring in areas likely to
face a disaster, are becoming reluctant to extend coverage to these imperiled
zones. "The typical way [the government] approaches disasters and
financing them is to provide aid. I call it de facto insurance," Brookings’
Litan says. "There is something of a backlash. A lot of people are standing up
and saying we don’t want to write a blank check." Litan and others are floating an idea to replace the current
system with a national insurance plan to cover disaster-prone regions. Premiums
would not only provide greater security to insurers, giving them confidence to
continue writing policies in areas at risk, but also offer individuals a
financial incentive to live in less-risky areas–or if not, to bear some of the
cost. Litan suggests "pre-funding" for disasters in a formal federal reinsurance
program administered by the Treasury Department, loosely modeled after the
federal terrorism reinsurance program established in 2002. Under such a scheme,
participants in high-risk areas would pay premiums that would reflect actuarial
risk. This plan would include incentives for states and municipalities to
encourage better building codes and land use rules. This way, too, individuals
and businesses would bear some limited amount of first-dollar losses through
insurance policy deductibles. Legislation along those lines is in the works. Rep. Ginny
Brown-Waite (R-Fla.) introduced a bill in November that would authorize the
Treasury to sell reinsurance contracts at auction to provide homeowners with
disaster coverage. Some insurers, too, have begun to weigh in on this
discussion. In November, Allstate became a charter member of an advocacy
website, ProtectingAmerica.org, ostensibly to help citizens better prepare for
disasters (and thus potentially lower the company’s exposure to damage), but
also to push to establish catastrophe funds.
|