subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Money & Meaning / Philanthropy /
Calculated Response
Spontaneous Compassion
Russ Alan Prince and Hannah Shaw Grove
12/01/2007

While the results are similar across segments, the rationale is likely different: High-influence givers often want a similar level of involvement in all their financial affairs, and they treat philanthropy as an extension of a bigger initiative, while low-influence givers see the planned-giving process as a way of taking action now to reduce the need for involvement down the road.

Many affluent donors make contributions with little or no advance planning, possibly sacrificing substantial benefits.

There are a number of vehicles for the charitably inclined to consider, and our respondents have used most all of them (see chart below). Yet they use some more often than others. Among survey respondents, the most popular vehicle for high-influence givers is the charitable remainder trust, with 60 percent reporting they have established one. Thirty-four percent of high influence respondents prefer private foundations. By contrast, almost three-quarters of low-influence givers use a simple will bequest as the way to structure their charitable gifts. Twenty-nine percent of the low-influence group use donor-advised funds.

A portion of our survey respondents—most in the low-influence category—also use charitable lead trusts, life insurance and charitable gift annuities. (Click image to enlarge)

About half of the individuals who have established planned gifts report that they have additional planned-giving needs. A much larger percentage of high-influence givers—58 percent—expect to enhance their existing gifts or establish additional ones, as compared with just 19 percent of the low-influence givers.

For making future donations, high-influence givers cited the same gifting vehicles—private foundations, charitable remainder trusts and charitable lead trusts—as their low-influence counterparts. The latter group, however, expressed an interest in exploring other options, with the highest level of interest—52 percent—being in the establishment of a private foundation. After that, interest in other giving structures dropped off considerably, with just 13 percent identifying the donor-advised fund as a product of interest.

Russ Alan Prince is the president of Prince & Associates, a market research and consulting firm for the affluent, and the author of more than 35 books on related topics. Hannah Shaw Grove, an author and columnist, is an expert on the behavior, concerns and finances of affluent consumers.

1 | 2 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference