 |
Marriages of fiscal unequals often labor under unacknowledged emotional
burdens. If we can identify and discuss them, we may be able to set these
shackles aside, allowing our relationships to proceed unfettered.
Role Reversal and Esteem In relationships in which affluent women marry
nonaffluent men, the economic role each partner plays is the reverse of
society’s norm, which may lead to self-esteem issues on both sides. Jon Gallo,
of the Gallo Institute, explains, “The woman worries whether it is OK to be more
powerful economically than her husband, and the husband is suddenly no longer
the breadwinner, and so he asks, ‘Who am I in this relationship?’”
The affluent spouse Many women inheritors are under severe pressure in
relationships with fiscal unequals because of their own expectations about who
should support whom. James E. Hughes Jr. notes that a growing number of
psychologists subscribe to the belief that at least some of these expectations
are predetermined. He points to work by John Marshall Townsend, who, in his 1998
book, What Women Want—What Men Want: Why the Sexes Still See Love and Commitment
So Differently, describes a survey of young women in medical school who admitted
that, despite their potentially high social and financial status, they still
wanted their spouses to support them.
Hughes notes that the revolution in
property distribution, in which the control of wealth and assets has begun to
shift from the hands of men into the hands of women, will have serious
repercussions for marriages. “The men they form relationships with are very
likely not to be held by society in the same esteem.”
This perception, if not
acknowledged by a couple, can put enormous pressure on the marriage, and
manifest itself in resentment, arguments about control of assets and income, and
chronic problems with in-laws.
Lee Hausner, of IFF Advisors, says these
pressures are ending an increasing number of relationships. “In the last seven
or eight years, I’ve noticed that women heirs were never on their first
marriages, and when I’ve asked them why, it was always about the money,” she
says.
The nonaffluent spouse Professional men who marry into money often find
it very difficult to maintain their sense of self-esteem, especially if their
new families do not share their view of the value of a career. This is much less
of a problem when he marries someone who has built her own fortune, notes Joan
DiFuria, of the Money Meaning and Choices Institute. “The self-earners will work
with the nonaffluent spouse much differently than an inheritor of wealth,” she
says, because they will have more of the same values in common.
Hausner
relates the story of a leading surgeon she met some years back who was
considered a wet blanket by his wife’s family because he could not drop
everything and join them for long vacations on short notice. “He got no credit,
no respect for his accomplishments,” she says, “so they eventually got
divorced.”
GUILT
The affluent spouse Guilt plagues many inheritors, DiFuria
notes. “When people don’t work there’s a high guilt factor, especially with
women, who may be extremely generous with the men in their lives, whom may not
be as financially competent,” she explains. This can lead affluent women to
choose poor spouses, or to simply fail to embrace the opportunities their wealth
provides.
The nonaffluent spouse The nonaffluent spouse may feel enormous guilt
about leaving his own family behind economically. This may lead to difficulties
setting boundaries and setting expectations with the nonaffluent in-laws.
Meanwhile, depending on their own values, the nonaffluent spouse’s family may
look down upon his new wealth and ostracize or criticize him for it, leading to
further emotional turmoil.
“There are going to be extended-family members and
step-family members who feel they have certain rights and try to exert
influence,” according to wealth advisor Thayer Cheatham Willis. “The husband or
wife needs to make it clear what they’re available for, and what they are not
available for. It’s really important to make clear that this is my life partner
and this is where my priority is,” she notes.
DEPENDENCY
The affluent spouse We may suffer the nagging worry that we
are being romantically pursued solely for our money by someone seeking an
emotional or financial safe harbor, rather than a healthy relationship. This is
a significant impediment to honest dialogue. While we must acknowledge that our
affluence may play some part in our attraction, especially to people seeking
security in a relationship, determining how important it is to our fiancée or
spouse is very difficult. John, a businessman and inheritor, notes that it is
impossible to divide love into its constituent parts. “Does a person know why
she loves you? How much does the money play into her considerations? It’s all
very difficult to separate,” he admits.
The nonaffluent spouse The nonaffluent spouse may feel the affluent
spouse is playing by what Willis calls “the nasty version of the golden rule: He
who has the gold makes the rules.” There is, she says, a tremendous amount of
truth to this, whether we want to acknowledge it or not, and having little
control over the family assets, or having to ask permission to make purchases,
can be galling for the nonaffluent spouse. It can spur self-esteem issues and
resentment. Willis urges couples to try to eliminate the financial dependency in
their relationships as quickly as possible by furnishing the nonaffluent spouse
with a measure of financial independence.
MISTRUST
The affluent spouse Those of us from affluent backgrounds
often find it difficult to establish trust with nonaffluent partners. “People who come from a moneyed background have been hit on a lot because of their
wealth,” says John, a businessman from an affluent family, who has been married
three times. “It’s like having a bull’s-eye on your back your whole life.” This
is a serious obstacle to communications—both before and during the marriage, he
says. “You learn to be very guarded about the wealth. People who do not come
from a moneyed background don’t understand that. They tend to be a lot more
generous, and they do not look at life through the lens of money, which people
tend to do if they have had it a long time.” Nonaffluent spouses also tend to
assume a couple’s assets are community property, while those of us who have been
through one or more divorces are usually loathe to mix our assets, having
firsthand experience of the legal repercussions of doing so.
The nonaffluent spouse When nonaffluent spouses are not trusted in a
meaningful way, with control over assets or perhaps a voice in the family
business, resentment can fester. Prenuptial agreements and trusts set up to
restrict the distribution of assets can be seen as votes of no confidence in the
marriage. The nonaffluent spouse needs to be invited into the family and
introduced to the various traditions and the governance rules for both the
family’s assets and its business, as appropriate.
Back to main article: "For Richer, For Poorer" |