Tanya J. Stanish is a partner in Jenner & Block’s Chicago
office and is a member of the firm’s Litigation & Dispute Resolution and
Family Law practices, concentrating in matrimonial and paternity law. Her work
includes complex negotiation, contested court proceedings and financial
analysis. She is also trained in collaborative law and divorce mediation. Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
managed to keep the terms of their recent divorce quiet by employing a private
judge who expeditiously and confidentially oversaw their dissolution. Other
troubled couples with highly compensated careers or a high net worth may wish to
keep their divorce and its terms from public scrutiny for personal, business or
financial reasons.
The private judge system is particularly appropriate for
couples who wish to avoid leaving a public record typical of a traditional court
trial, or for those couples who prefer to personally select a judge who has
experience with a certain legal or factual issue involved in their divorce. In
these cases, the couple hires and pays a judge, often a retired jurist, to
oversee their case. Each party is represented by an attorney, who presents the
evidence to the private judge, sometimes with less formality than in a
traditional court proceeding. The private judge’s decisions are binding on the
parties and are not disclosed to the public.
However, private judges are available in only a few states
(including California, Colorado, New York, Ohio and Texas), so most couples will
have to consider other options to protect their privacy. Several alternatives
exist, including mediation, collaborative law and direct negotiation between
lawyers. Aside from keeping the divorce out of the public eye, these options
also tend to keep legal costs down and minimize tension.
But exactly which process is best depends upon the spouses’
ability to negotiate with one another, the balance of power and knowledge in the
relationship, and the level of trust that exists, despite the estrangement. Each
process places the spouses and their attorneys in different roles with varying
degrees of participation.
Mediation is best suited for couples who want to minimize their
lawyers’ direct involvement in negotiation and retain more control over
negotiating the terms of their divorce. Collaborative law is an option for those
who want to participate in the negotiation, but who also want their lawyers to
be involved. Direct negotiation through lawyers is the best alternative for
spouses who prefer to leave the negotiations to their attorneys.
Spouses can use any of these processes to resolve parenting
issues, such as custody and parenting time, as well as financial matters,
including property division, alimony and child support. Each also permits the
spouses and their attorneys to employ other professionals, such as financial
advisors, CPAs, child specialists, appraisers and business evaluators, to
provide advice and assistance along the way. At the conclusion of each process,
the lawyers can further protect the privacy of the settlement outcome by keeping
the written settlement papers from the public file.
|