 |
Five years ago, Tim Cavanaugh left his job as an executive in the health care
industry to go to work full time for his family. His father-in-law, George
Russell, had recently sold the family business, the investment management firm
Frank Russell Co., to Northwestern Mutual for more than $1 billion, and he
wanted Cavanaugh to explore creative ways to meet and manage the personal
financial needs of family members. In his new position, Cavanaugh quickly
established a family office in Gig Harbour, Wash., to serve a dual purpose:
provide asset management and personal financial services to family members,
while putting those services under strict family control.
For many of us with
similar concerns, family offices are an effective means of ensuring that our
affairs are handled in a professional, confidential manner. Generally registered
as corporations or limited liability corporations, America’s estimated 3,000
family offices are entities set up to serve the business—and sometimes
personal—interests of a particular group. They range widely in scope and breadth
of services, from fairly simple operations with no more than an accountant and
administrative assistant on staff, to full-scale enterprises with investment
managers, philanthropic coordinators and lawyers. Whether established anew, or
as an adjunct to an existing business, these operations are typically highly
personalized to meet our personal needs. “Family offices have the thumbprint of
the family, but they also have their own DNA,” says Kathryn McCarthy, a family
office consultant in New York.
But are family offices worth our investment?
Experts estimate that the cost of running an office with even a small staff is
$400,000 to $500,000 a year. A larger operation, counting salaries, technology
and other expenses, can run $1 million annually for a family with a $100 million
asset base. “People have to want to spend money on this,” says McCarthy. In
fact, she recommends that families should have at least $75 million to $100
million in assets to justify even a simple office. For more ambitious, fully
staffed operations, the figure rises to $250 million.
Cavanaugh says his
primary goal was to establish a mechanism for investing and accounting for
family assets. His secondary aim was to provide administrative and management
support for the philanthropic foundation the Russells had established two years
earlier. “We’ve always been driven by a desire to work together and give
together,” he says, adding that the family office was a perfect way to make that
happen.
The Russell family’s relatively simple initial plan, however, had an
unintended dividend: It meant that setting up and launching the office took only
a few months. This is not always the case in multigenerational offices, where
different generations may have different agendas, says Douglas Freeman, an
attorney and chairman of IFF Advisors, an Irvine, Calif., consulting firm that
works with wealthy families. “The founder’s goal may be, ‘It’s my money, give me
all the cash flow,’ while the second generation may want growth.” As a result,
families planning more elaborate offices can spend a year, or even two, firming
up arrangements.
The Right Staff Over time, Cavanaugh expanded his family office’s
services—and the number of employees—considerably. “As family needs and wants
became apparent, we explored whether it was feasible to meet those needs
internally,” he recalls. His first hire was Kristen Powers, who works as the
chief business development officer in the Russell family operation. It seemed
clear to both Cavanaugh and Powers that family members needed investment
advisory and accounting services, so they recruited an investment advisor and
administrative assistant. Over the next two years, they added six accountants,
including a tax specialist, and two additional investment advisors.
Cavanaugh and Powers also hired nonfinancial employees. Because some family
members owned powerboats, hiring a person to oversee watercraft made sense. When
the family decided to erect a new building to house the family office and
foundation, they hired a construction manager. They also added an employee to
coordinate family travel and retreats. Following the death of Cavanaugh’s
mother-in-law, Jane, the family hired a photo archivist to work with the
family’s photo albums and other memorabilia. All of these new employees now work
under the umbrella of the family office, Powers explains.
TOP VIEW To meet both personal and business needs, many of us have established formal
family offices with permanent staffs of advisors and administrators. Though they
can be costly to establish and maintain, these offices enable us to retain
direct control over our business and personal affairs, in an atmosphere of
complete confidentiality. | At the same time,
Cavanaugh decided against some services that other family offices provide. For
example, he nixed the idea of bringing in a money manager. “We knew it didn’t
make sense to hire somebody to walk the dog,” says Powers. Cavanaugh also chose
to work with only outside attorneys, choosing best-of-breed lawyers as
needed.
Not surprisingly, salaries are the largest expense in family offices.
At the Russell family office, salaries amount to approximately 60 percent of
total costs. To pay for the services, Cavanaugh considered several approaches.
In most family offices, the senior generation has considerably more money than
younger members. Some families agree that each member pays based on the
percentage of assets managed by the office, or members of the senior generation
simply pay more than younger relatives. Cavanaugh opted for a two-pronged
approach: Costs for such basics as investment advice and accounting—services
all 10 family members wanted—were split equally among the five households, based
on the amount of assets. For other services, families were charged an amount
based on the estimated cost, because some family members tended to use certain
services more than others.
The number of staff in most family offices varies
due to a variety of factors: the number of family members, the services they
require and the type of investments they pursue, among others. “A family whose
main asset is in commercial property in multiple states would have more staff
than one primarily investing in securities,” says Ellen Perry, managing partner
of Wealthbridge Partners in Washington, D.C. “A family with 20 members and many
services needs a larger staff than one with five members who only want money
management and tax preparation.” On the other hand, what McCarthy calls
“compliance offices”—offices that simply handle bill paying or tax
preparation—require just one or two people.
Families should have least $75 million to $100 million in assets to
justify even a simple office. For more ambitious, fully staffed operations,
the figure rises to $250 million. | McCarthy recalls a family office
started by a patriarch and his four children. Because their primary goal was
investment management for the family, they only needed a small staff. They hired
an accountant who was a veteran of the financial services industry. His role was
to monitor the family’s investment managers and work with an investment
consultant. Because family members were actively involved in the office, they
found no need for additional staff, and outsourced legal and tax preparation
work.
Family Governance Of course, Cavanaugh did not unilaterally make all
goal-setting and hiring decisions. He turned to the office’s board of
directors, a governing council composed of adult members of all five family
households. That group actually started meeting informally about 10 years
earlier to make financial, estate planning and philanthropic decisions. But
about a year after launching the family office, they formalized the structure
and introduced regular quarterly meetings. While the board does not manage
day-to-day decisions, it does supervise a wide range of activities, from
approving financial statements to endorsing budgets and performing annual
compensation reviews. As in many other family offices, the Russells also have
committees to oversee such areas as client services, existing investment and new
investment.
When the Russell family meets, each household is given one vote.
Other families do it differently, however. For example, the older generation may
have more votes than the younger. Decisions might be made in such a way that the current senior generation retains control, and then, over time, transfers it
to the next generation, says John Duncan, a Chicago attorney with Duncan
Associates, which sets up private trusts. “They’re creating a mechanism so the
younger members can take over during a five- to 10-year period.”
An equitable
system for counting votes and approving decisions is a strategy for alleviating
the myriad issues related to personal relationships and conflicting needs within
the family. While Cavanaugh contends there has not been a serious dispute in his
family, other offices are not so lucky—especially when sibling relationships are
involved. Freeman recalls a family office in which two brothers worked. One was
highly competent, the other was not. “The one brother was mad because his
brother was getting paid for doing nothing,” he says. When their father died,
the first brother attempted to oust the other from the job. Lawsuits were hurled
back and forth, and the matter was ultimately settled out of court.
The
biggest challenges, however, commonly result from poor communication. “If you
don’t quite understand what’s going on, mistrust rears its ugly head,” explains
Lee Hausner, a psychologist and vice chairman of IFF Advisors. In fact, that is
why the Russell family introduced both a series of scheduled emails with family
updates and quarterly mailings, sent out before meetings. It took serious work
to devise the best way to communicate important information, however. Consider
financial reports. Some family members wanted more detail than others.
Determining a reporting form that met everyone’s idiosyncrasies took several
months. “As with any business, you have to be constantly flexible,” Cavanaugh
adds.
“Offices change over time, reflecting how the family is changing,”
McCarthy adds. And the Russells are changing. According to Cavanaugh, his office
recently embarked on yet another round of change. In January, the family decided
to turn the operation into a multifamily office, called Threshold Partners,
further formalizing administrative support around specific family goals. Of this
continual evolution, Cavanaugh observes, “Starting a family office has had all
the surprises, complexity and satisfaction of starting your own small
business.”
|