subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Money & Meaning / Family Matters /
Family Office
Office Protocol
Anne Field
06/01/2004


Cavanaugh and Powers also hired nonfinancial employees. Because some family members owned powerboats, hiring a person to oversee watercraft made sense. When the family decided to erect a new building to house the family office and foundation, they hired a construction manager. They also added an employee to coordinate family travel and retreats. Following the death of Cavanaugh’s mother-in-law, Jane, the family hired a photo archivist to work with the family’s photo albums and other memorabilia. All of these new employees now work under the umbrella of the family office, Powers explains.

TOP VIEW
To meet both personal and business needs, many of us have established formal family offices with permanent staffs of advisors and administrators. Though they can be costly to establish and maintain, these offices enable us to retain direct control over our business and personal affairs, in an atmosphere of complete confidentiality.
At the same time, Cavanaugh decided against some services that other family offices provide. For example, he nixed the idea of bringing in a money manager. “We knew it didn’t make sense to hire somebody to walk the dog,” says Powers. Cavanaugh also chose to work with only outside attorneys, choosing best-of-breed lawyers as needed.

Not surprisingly, salaries are the largest expense in family offices. At the Russell family office, salaries amount to approximately 60 percent of total costs. To pay for the services, Cavanaugh considered several approaches. In most family offices, the senior generation has considerably more money than younger members. Some families agree that each member pays based on the percentage of assets managed by the office, or members of the senior generation simply pay more than younger relatives. Cavanaugh opted for a two-pronged approach: Costs for such basics as investment advice and accounting—services all 10 family members wanted—were split equally among the five households, based on the amount of assets. For other services, families were charged an amount based on the estimated cost, because some family members tended to use certain services more than others.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Finding the Perfect Fit
» Best in Class
» Bearish Portents
» Emergency Responsiveness
» Defying Convention
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference