Barbarians at the Gate One of the events in a corporate life that can
truly test a family’s decision-making cohesion is the sale of equity to third
parties, either via an initial public offering or a private equity
investment.“I think that it was definitely a learning process for
everybody,” Molino recalls of the discussions leading up to his family’s
mid-2003 IPO. “We would occasionally bring everybody together, maybe go in the
boardroom, and hash things out. The people who were really involved in the
decision were myself, my four siblings and my mother—the principal shareholder
group—and we really went back and forth for a long time looking at the private
equity versus the IPO option. We came very, very close to negotiating a private
equity transaction.” The private equity deal was less attractive because the
veto rights being sought by the investors would have tied the family’s hands,
despite their not selling a majority stake in the company. “For our culture, the
kind of company that we were, it would not have worked,” Molina notes. “We would
not have been happy. So that’s why we decided to go public.” The family has
retained a 70 percent stake in the company. Preparing for an IPO or, in some
cases a private equity acquisition, may require painful changes to the company
roster. One of the first things an investment bank will advise an entrepreneur
looking to go public is: Fire your family. Institutional investors do not like
to see a corporate hierarchy stuffed full of brothers, sisters and cousins.
Board independence is also a pressing issue, especially with corporate
governance being such a high-profile topic with investors.
|