Chery Automobile, the
eighth-largest carmaker in China, has ambitious global export plans. The company
employs a point man in the United States, Malcolm Bricklin, the entrepreneur who
first brought Subaru to the United States in the 1960s. Last year, he made Chery
sound like Detroit’s next scourge when he announced that his auto importing
company, Visionary Vehicles, would start bringing Chery cars into the United
States in 2007. Bricklin claimed he would try to sell 250,000 Chery cars per
year, close to the annual sales of General Motors’ Saturn division and Ford’s
Mercury. "I’d like to look at it as being the next Toyota," Bricklin has said,
hinting that Chery might be considering a U.S. assembly plant and, unbelievable
though it may be, a Chery that might woo buyers away from the much-loved BMW 3
Series.
While the Chinese and Indians speed to catch up, the strategic moves of Japanese car manufacturers are of far more importance. | The U.S. market introduction is now on hold until 2008. Nearly
every week, however, there are reports throughout the global auto industry that
another Western business executive or another company is looking to invest in a
Chinese auto company. Some of these reports are only rumors. Bricklin himself
has a history of more misfires than hits: After his success with importing
Subaru, he went bankrupt building his own Bricklin sports car in Canada in the
1970s. Then, in the mid-1980s, he peddled the ill-fated Yugo in North America,
the car Consumer
Reports called one of the worst it had ever
tested.
The recent news that George Soros plans to front Chery’s development with a
$200 million investment has put the company ahead of larger Chinese rivals, such
as Shanghai Automotive Industry, which has also been eager to become a global
automaker. China has been particularly aggressive about hyping its nascent auto
industry and its efforts to develop domestic proprietary technology. Through
its Sino-foreign joint venture assembly plants, China has already become the
fourth-largest auto manufacturer in the world, ahead of South Korea and France.
As with most of the sectors the government would like to expand, China mandates
that foreign car companies wanting to sell vehicles in China must enter into
joint ventures with Chinese companies first. In the auto industry, the Chinese
partner is required to own at least 50 percent of each new venture, thus
creating a built-in training ground for local hires who might someday apply
their engineering and design talents to Chinese-owned car companies. Their research and development, however, is not yet up to
global standards. At the auto industry’s annual North American International
Auto Show last January, a Chinese car was on display for the first time. The
sedan, built by China’s fourth-largest auto company, Geely Automobile, looked
like a 15-year-old Japanese car, with cheap-feeling seats, plastic trim pieces
that appeared to be fragile and a utilitarian design that would not stir the
soul of U.S. consumers. Do not expect Chinese automakers to challenge the
world’s preeminent Asian manufacturers, Toyota and Honda, nor the potent
partnership of France’s Renault and Japan’s Nissan, for well over a decade. It
will take these Chinese companies longer still to have a major impact in the
segment where the most profitable autos are sold: the global luxury-car market
dominated by the likes of BMW and DaimlerChrysler. TOP VIEW: Investors will be hearing more in the next few years about Chinese
and Indian carmakers that hope to ride the wave of their emerging markets to
become truly global players in the automobile industry. In reality, these
manufacturers have much to learn about quality control and contemporary car
sales; they remain at least a decade away from being globally competitive. But
as growing consumer markets, China and India, in particular, will set the tone
for the strategic direction of other carmakers around the world. | As South Korean auto industry executives have learned over the
past 20 years of global expansion efforts, and as Toyota and Honda officials
gleaned before the Koreans, the automotive business is about much more than just
slapping together cars whose designs copy those of bigger, established auto
companies, putting cheap price tags on the new vehicles and shipping them
overseas. The Chinese and Indian auto companies have much to learn about
quality, dealership development, distinctive brand design, warranty and
ownership programs, marketing and consumer trends, and buyer loyalty. Though
tantalizingly attractive on many levels, the auto business remains a stubbornly
complicated and expensive worldwide industry to crack. According to Michael
Dunne, an auto analyst based in China, it is more cost efficient to build a
Honda Accord in Japan these days than in China because of continuing
inefficiencies in parts production and supply there. A car today can have as
many as 20,000 parts, making development and manufacturing far more complicated
than many industry entrants may initially realize.GM filed a lawsuit against the upstart Chery, claiming that its
best-selling car in China, the QQ, is a direct copy of the Chevrolet Spark.
Nevertheless, for all of the news of China being on the cusp of developing its
own automobile industries with global clout, the cars rolling off its indigenous
assembly lines resemble Yugo more than Chevy; in reality, Hyundai and other
makers of economy cars will be most threatened by new exporters. Still Made in Japan While the Chinese and Indians speed to catch up, the strategic
moves Japanese car manufacturers are making are currently of far more importance
to investors. The Japanese are eager to develop products that will meet the
needs of China, India, Russia and smaller, emerging consumer markets. It took
Detroit long enough, but GM, at least, is finally beginning to recognize that
hybrid cars and strategic mergers might be the company’s only salvation.
|