subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Commentary-People / Politics, Policy & Finance /
Visions & Revisions
Everything in Moderation
11/01/2005

Which is more pressing to you, as a Republican and an affluent individual: tax relief or budget deficits?

I think that’s a Hobson’s choice, or [laughs] maybe a Sophie’s choice, but I’m against both. I’m not an ideologue on taxes. I’m wealthy, and when people raise taxes, they hit me first. But if that money were going to be well used, then fine, I would be in favor of it. For instance, in education, I would support much higher taxes if the system weren’t so dysfunctional.

When you ran for governor, certain conservative Republicans attacked you as being a liberal, which certainly is not your record.

I’ve been pro death penalty for a long time. I ran the criminal justice initiative in the state, which should have marked me as an arch conservative. However, somebody found a quote from me saying, “If I were a judge, I think I’d have a hard time condemning somebody to death,” which I had said casually, long before I was in politics. All of a sudden, I was branded as a liberal who opposed the death penalty. The arch conservatives make up around 10 percent of Republicans, but they control the primaries, and everything is ideology with them.

Is there any way to bridge the ideological chasms among all groups—conservatives, moderates and liberals—on hot-button social issues?

G.K. Chesterton said that all theology can be wrapped up in two sentences: The first is, “In God’s eyes, I’m extremely important.” The second is, “In God’s eyes, everyone else is just as important as I am.” So whether you are saint or sinner, gay, straight or whatever, in God’s eyes you are important. That doesn’t mean I have to agree with you, it just means that I have to respect the fact that you are important.

Some liberals say that Bill Clinton was the greatest moderate Republican president the country ever had.

I think they are right. It is intriguing that two people who were more-or-less disgraced in office—Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton—were very good presidents. Say what you want about character, but what Clinton did with welfare was great for the country, and he was the only Democrat who could have pulled that off. People who are off welfare now are much more likely to be happy and successful. Who wants to be a victim the rest of their lives?

Have you ever considered becoming a Clinton-type Democrat?

No. The liberal Democrats who control the primaries don’t want me. For that matter, the ultra-conservative Republicans who control their primaries don’t really want me, either.

Photograph by Gary Moss.
1 | 2 | 3 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend
 
FREE ISSUE! FREE GIFT!

Get your instant FREE GIFT of the top 25 QUESTIONS you must ask your advisor!

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE GIFT. If you like it, pay just $40.00 for 9 more issues (10 in all). If it’s not for you, write ‘cancel’ on the invoice, return it, and you owe nothing! The FREE issue and FREE GIFT are yours to keep!
Name
Address

BONUS: Pay now and receive two extra issues absolutely FREE! That’s 12 issues total! (click here)

Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference